Name: Tim
E-mail: NansemondNative
Good Evening Josh.
I think you are right on time with your view of Oliver Stone's work and what he has done since "JFK" leading up to "World Trade Center". I almost passed it by because I am not a big Cage fan except for "Raising Arizona". However, it took me off guard and it's underlying, I feel, theme of basic human hope made me care about what I was seeing.
I will say, and this is not schmoozing - it is sincere, that I believe with my soul that "Head Shot" would have been better theatrically than "JFK" was. This is not meant to take anything away from that film though.
I know you will disagree but I thought "Natural Born Killers" was a trip to watch because it had this mix of comedy and violence that I found to be unusual in the format. Juliette Lewis I thought pretty much stole the show. In addition, I'm pretty sure Stone had shot and mixed some Super-8 in with the regular 35. It's not the first time anybody has seen him do this as evidenced in "JFK". The blight would be that the story was penned by QT and I know he's not big on your list of guys to slam down a beer with.
Finally, I saw a movie the other day called "A Face In the Crowd" with Andy Griffith and a young Lee Remick along with Walter Matthau. It was directed by Elia Kazan. Griffith played Lonesome Rhodes and I will say he was the ultimate cunning lying snake in the grass. Excellent movie I thought! Expert performance by Griffith. No Opie in this one and I think it would blow most people away who have never watched it.
Thanks Josh.
Tim |
Dear Tim:
Yes, "A Face in the Crowd" is a great movie, and Andy Griffith couldn't be
better. And Lee Remick in her first movie is so cute it's ridiculous. It's
also a very early performance of Walter Matthau, who's also very good.
Meanwhile, I just hated "Natural Born Killers," which seemed like a total
jerk-off to me. Oh boy, you can switch from 35mm to super-8 to video to
black and white to color -- so what? Making fun of a TV news reporter, even
at that point, was meaningless. The reality of TV news turning into pure
entertainment had already occurred, so the movie said nothing. I'll take
"Badlands" any day of the week. Thanks for the nice comment about "Head
Shot."
Josh |
Name: Tom
E-mail: tomkat91@yahoo.com
Dear Josh:
Greetings from England Sir, I am a sci fi fan and would love to add your autograph to my collection. May I send you a monster card to sign? Please send me a postal address which I may contact you. All the best. Keep up the great stuff! Cheers from, Tom (somewhere over a desk in London) |
Dear Tom:
A monster card, eh? Sure, why not. Shirley will give the address. [Please allow a few weeks, send to: Shirley (Robbins) LeVasseur, BeckerFilms; c/o P.O. Box 86; East Vassalboro, ME 04935; USA] Please
include return postage.
Josh |
Name: Jason Roth
E-mail: scootermcgurk@yahoo.com
Dear Josh:
You wrote-
>>So, seven years into making a feature, eh? Where are you along the path?
>>What lessons did you learn?
The film, Too Dead to Die, is in the last stage of editing, with a couple tiny insert shots to grab & some CG FX work. I'll be premiering the beast in October at the local Grand Rapids arthouse theater, to kick off an indie horror & sci-fi film festival. It'll be an absolute gas to be done with it and see how an audience reacts to it.
As for lessons learned, I learned a lot of basics, such as: never go into production without a solid script (biggest lesson of all!), never let actors get drunk, don't wave around toy guns in front of a bank without informing the authorities, never work with animals or children, and so on.
I've also learned which of my cast & crew are truly reliable- the ones who stuck with the project for faaaar longer than anyone should be asked to. Made a lot of good friends, and now I've got a good stock company of actors, crew, & musicians who are willing to do more projects.
So all in all, a protracted, painful, but ultimately positive experience. I may stick to animated shorts for a bit before tackling the next live-action feature, though!
Best,
Jason |
Dear Jason:
You obviously learned the important lessons. The solid script realization
is a big one. Many folks think they can improve their poorly-worked-out
script on the set, and you can't. As good old Bruce Campbell once said, "If
you have script problems and you don't fix them by the time you shoot, your
script problems then become 40 feet tall." Drunk actors are worthless. And
you just have to figure out how to deal with kids and animals because they
keep ending up in scripts. Anyway, good luck with your film, and good work
getting it finished.
Josh |
Name: Rob Mclaine
E-mail: info@evildeadchainsaws.com
Hi Josh,
I need some help, I'm trying put together a Score/Soundtrack list for "within the woods". I've idenified 2/3 of the tracks and listed them below. Would you be able to shed any light on the remaining tracks, or even the films they may have come from?
I'd really appreciate any help you can give me.
Cheers, Rob.
Within The Woods Score
----------------------
1. Main Title (Death Wish Score - Paint Her Mouth)
used as main titles moving through swamp to house
2. Going For A Picnic (????????????????????????????)
Bruce & Ellen walk from the house into the woods
3. BAAA! (Invasion Of The Body Snatchers Score - Infiltration (Suite))
firelighting sound effect
4. Bruce Has Gone (Invasion Of The Body Snatchers Score - Main Title)
Used as ellen wakes up & realizes bruce is gone
5. Main Title (Death Wish Score - Paint Her Mouth)
Used as ellen is starting to be chased
6. Chasing Ellen (Death Wish Score - Suite Revenge: Striking Back,
Riverside Park, The Alley, 8th Avenue Station)
Chase track as monster is chasing ellen through forest back to house
7. Will scott Answer The Door? (On Her Majesty's Secret Service Score - This Never Happened To The Other Feller)
Ellen bangs on the door, scott takes his time to answer
8. Trying To Calm Ellen (????????????????????????????)
Shelly & scott try to calm ellen, scott leaves to look for bruce
9. Bruce Attacks Shelly (????????????????????????????)
Shelly goes to look for bruce. He attacks & stabs her
10. Bruce Is Trying To Get in (Invasion Of The Body Snatchers Score - Rescue)
Use as ellen get the knife & goes over to the door & stabs scott
11. BAAA! (Invasion Of The Body Snatchers Score - Infiltration (Suite))
Bruce jumps Out
12. Can't Get The Door Shut (????????????????????????????)
Ellen can't get the door shut, bruce is attacking
13. Going Into The Cellar (Invasion Of The Body Snatchers Score - Main Title)
Used as ellen makes her way into the cellar
14. Ellen Emerges From The Cellar (Invasion Of The Body Snatchers Score - Angel of Death)
Used as ellen comes out of the cellar
15. Ellen discovers Shelly's Body (????????????????????????????)
Ellen finds Shelly's body, then bruce jumps out
16. BAAA! (Invasion Of The Body Snatchers Score - Infiltration (Suite))
Bruce jumps Out
17. Bruce & Ellen Fight (Jaws Score - The Underwater Siege)
bruce bites off his hand and he & ellen fight.
18. Ellen Stabs Bruce (Jaws Score - The Underwater Siege) (Repeats from start)
Ellen & Bruce wrestle on the monopoly board, Ellen picks up the knife & stabs Bruce.
19. Bruce attacks A Second Time (????????????????????????????)
Bruce attacks ellen a 2nd time, Ellen chops him up with the axe
20. Ellen Cries For Bruce (????????????????????????????)
Same music as track 2 (Going For A Picnic)
21. End Credits (Sorcerer Soundtrack - Tangerine Dream - Search)
Song used over end credits
Radio Songs
-----------
22. Radio Song #1 (????????????????????????????)
Plays while they prepare the food for the picnic
23. Radio Song #2 (Sister Sledge - We Are Family)
Plays on the radio while scott & Shelly are playing monopoly |
Dear Rob:
I wasn't around for the scoring of that film, or the shooting, for that
matter, so I can't help you. The music all works amazing well, though. The
two scores that we all fell back on regularly were, as you noted, Herbie
Hancock's score for "Death Wish" and Denny Zeitlin's score for the 1978
remake of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers," both of which have long
stretches of suspenseful, scary music that almost always randomly synched up
to the action.
Josh |
Name: David
E-mail:
Hey Josh,
I've been doing some shooting with a 16mm handcranked Bolex for the first time in years. Fun stuff. I filmed my girlfriend, who had only seen herself on video, and she loved the look of Kodak black and white reversal.
This reminded me: don't you have a friend who has been shooting a film with a Bolex? Did that ever get finished? Any interesting Bolex stories to share? Cool effects, bad screw-ups, whatever. |
Dear David:
Yes, my buddy Paul has just completed his first decade of working on that
film. Will he ever finish? None of us know. He does have a lot of
good-looking footage, though. The key Paul and I discovered with the Bolex
is before shooting any shot remember the three Fs: focus, f-stop, and
frame-rate. The biggest problem is opening the aperature all the way to see
what you're doing, then forgetting to set it back at the proper exposure.
Given that the camera and the lenses are really just cheap junk, it's
amazing how gorgeous some of the footage is.
Josh |
Name: K.D.N.
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
Just saw WORLD TRADE CENTER. I agree with you on the rational believability, but I didn't care for it and it was 30 minutes too long for me.
Meanwhile, you said Wyler constantly sought out themes that he believed in like Family in War Times. He also seemed to have a thing for doomed love and unhappy endings.
WUTHERING HEIGHTS (Cathy forsakes love of a stable boy)
THE HEIRESS (ugly duckling discovers her suitor IS a fortune hunter)
DETECTIVE STORY (discovers wife has an abortion, destroys marriage)
CARRIE (forsakes rich life for love, ends in suicide)
ROMAN HOLIDAY (princess forsakes love for her duty)
THE CHILDREN'S HOUR (engagement broken up over rumors of lesbianism)
THE COLLECTOR (doesn't trust the woman, results in her death)
FUNNY GIRL (gambler cannot take wife's fame, ruins his marriage with jail)
I don't get it. I can tell where he gets the families in war time because of his childhood, but doomed love? His second marriage lasted the rest of his life. |
Dear K.D.N.:
You could also add "Jezebel" into that list. "Dodsworth," on the other
hand, is about a marriage dying and new love taking hold. In many of
Wyler's other films love does triumph, like "The Best Years of Our Lives"
(which also has the marriage dying and new love taking hold, as well as a
new love, and an old love rekindled), "The Big Country," though he starts
with the wrong girl, he ends up with the right one. Anyway, I admire the
fact that Wyler frequently didn't need a happy ending on his stories.
Perhaps his first marriage to Margaret Sullivan really broke his heart.
Josh |
Name: John Vesbit
E-mail: planzdissonant@hotmail.com
Dear Josh, Mr. Becker if you like,
As an aspiring writer/director in Michigan in the year 2007, my question is this; In your opinion do you think it would be easier or harder to raise money for an independent feature than lets say in 1978 (Evil Dead) ? Furtherly, do you think that the dentists and big-shots have cooled on the idea of investing in independent cinema, seeing as how flooded the market already is? I guess I'm straying from the real question. What I really want to ask is, Given how many low-budget horror/sci-fi movies are out there already, is there still room for one more? and can it still have the potential to make a profit? |
Dear John:
Anything's possible. The bottom line of filmmaking is, if you've got to
make a movie, then you'll make it no matter what. The marketplace be
damned. Nothing says, however, that if you make it they'll come. The only
thing you can be sure of is, if you make a movie, then you've got a movie.
If you happen to have a worthwhile story to tell, people might even pay
attention. Or not, there's no way to know in advance. Regarding the
raising of money back then and now, I had a bitch of time raising the money
for TSNKE. Sam, Rob and Bruce with ED were much better at it than me.
Raising money is extremely difficult, then, now, whenever. For better or
worse this is the time period you're stuck in, so this is what you've got to
deal with. Good luck.
Josh |
Name: Anthony Walker
E-mail: tbalony@gmail.com
Dear Josh:
New Zealand sounds like a hoot, I have a pal named Titch up in the Coramandel Valley who everyone seems to know. I really like what you say about religion and hope one day humanity can be de-programmed from all this archaic and lethal nonsense. Cheers =Tony= |
Dear Tony:
I'm glad you agree with my views. Personally, though, I don't believe that
humans will ever move beyond their superstitions.
Josh |
Name: JonathanMoody
E-mail: jondoe_555@hotmail.com
Dear Josh:
Hey just wanted to let everyone know that if anyone still wants to listen to the interview I did with you well now they can. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/JonathanMoody/page/6 I hope to all your fans who couldn't hear this interview enjoys it.
So how are all your projects coming along? Have anything in the works we may be excited to hear about?
Your fan,
Jonathan |
Dear Jonathan:
Everything for me is in a big stall right now. It could all come back to
life in the new year, but I'll just have to wait and see. I thought
"Rushes" would be out already, but it hasn't even been fully laid out yet,
so maybe it'll be out before the end of the year, we'll see about that, too.
Josh |
Name: Donkey
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
What band, that first debuted in the 2000's, is your favorite? I know you don't dig a lot of current music, but I'm just curious to know what you do like. :) |
Dear Donkey:
I'm just an old stick-in-the-mud and I don't listen to any music made in the
2000s. My musical taste barely makes it into the 1980s.
Josh |
Name: Scott
E-mail: sspnyc66@mac.com
Josh,
Just to clarify, "She's not There" is a song by The Zombies and not The Kinks, and I would have to disagree with you about The Kinks as they became a little lost in the 70's doing concept albums which did not work too well, ("Celluloid Heroes" being a song from one of those albums), however, I think 3 of their greatest albums are "Something Else", "The Village Green Preservation Society", and "Arthur (Or the Decline and Fall of the British Empire)". All were made in the late 60's.
I am a big fan of the Kinks and I think Ray Davies is one of the best lyricists in Popular music. What I find with them is either people like them or they don't and there is no real reason for that.
Much of it may have to do with the fact that Davies's songs are very English in nature and most are about England, but I think the themes in his songs transcend the Atlantic and can be applied to much of American society as well as other western societies.
Anyhow, I think one of their best songs is a song called "20th Century Man" from "The Muswell Hillbillies" album which is one of their best albums from the 70's, and there is a great live version of that song on "One for the Road" from 1980.
Lastly, I had always wonderded what you thought about the film "Quadrophenia" and now you have answered that question here.
I always enjoyed that film too and I received it as a gift for my birthday when it came out on DVD a few years back. I hadn't seen it in ages and I have to say that it still held up very well when I watched it again for the first time in a long time and as the Album "Quadrophenia" is my favorite album by "The Who", I too felt that the film was a very good interpretation of the Album and much better than "Tommy", but I never found the story in "Tommy" to be all that great anyhow and I think the story in "Quadrophenia' is much stronger and more believable.
I too wish Franc Roddam would have gone on to so better things, but not to be...
Scott |
Dear Scott:
I knew "She's Not There" was The Zombies the second I pushed send. Crap! I meant, "You Really Got Me." I had a brain-wiring problem.Well, anyway, I still think the same nonsensical thoughts about The Kinks.
I liked them at first, then grew to not care. But that's just me, there's
plenty I used to care about that I no longer care about. It almost shocks
me. The fact that I keep trudging through the minefield of the film
business when I don't care about or like most movies I now see seems utterly
absurd. Meanwhile, I did see a film I liked, "World Trade Center." It was
so rationally made that I began to doubt that it actually was Oliver Stone.
When it was over I got a bit angry at Stone, thinking, "You son of a bitch,
you can actually make decent, rational, emotionally believable movies, but
you just haven't bothered for the last 15 years." I'd say it's Stone's best
film since "JFK."
Josh |
Name: Bob
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
Do you like the song "Celluloid Heroes"? It's one of my favorites. |
Dear Bob:
It's funny you bring that up because I was just bitching about the Kinks the
other day. I think they were a great early rock band that quickly developed
into a novelty song band. The Kinks' work in 1964, like "She's Not There,"
is the cutting edge of rock and roll, but everything thereafter, including
"Celluloid Heroes," is set to a jaunty, inoffensive, English music hall
melody, similar to Paul McCartney's silliest songs, like "Lovely Rita" and
"When I'm 64." Anyway, so no, I'm not a big fan of it. But it's weird you
brought it up.
Josh |
Name: David R.
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
There was some discussion on here maybe a year or so ago about there not being an good female directors. Well, I think there is at least one good active female director, and possibly two.
Susanne Bier, the Danish filmmaker, has been doing very good work the past 10 or so years. She's not very well known here in the States, but her films "Brødre" (Brothers, 2004) and "Efter brylluppe" (After the Wedding, 2006) are both excellent. They are basically character dramas with superb acting. No special effects to speak of, just human drama.
Also, Caroline Link did a very good job with "Nirgendwo in Afrika" (Nowhere in Africa), which won the 2002 Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. I haven't seen any of her other films though so I can't be sure it wasn't a fluke. I was impressed with that film though. |
Dear David:
I saw "Nowhere in Africa" and I agree, it is a good movie, and well-made,
too. It seemed like a companion piece to "White Mischief," which I also
liked. White people in Africa during WWII. I haven't seen the Danish films
you mention, but I'll keep my eyes peeled.
Josh |
Name: Lucas
E-mail: check the archives
Hey Josh,
As part of a new job, I've recently had to subtitle two movies from the 1930s that I'd never heard of, and I'm interested to hear your opinions, if you have them.
One was "A Free Soul" (1931), and the other was "Female" (1933).
I can't say that I particularly enjoyed either one, but Clark Gable was pretty great in "A Free Soul".
Any thoughts?
Lucas |
Dear Lucas:
I haven't seen "Female," but it sounds very interesting, directed by Michael
Curtiz. "A Free Soul" is a big lumpy old early-sound Hollywood extravaganza
with a particularly good cast. It's famous for Lionel Barrymore winning an
Oscar, and he's pretty damn impressive in his big courtroom finale. Norma
Shearer kind of interests me, and young Clark Gable is great. I pretty much
always find Leslie Howard to be a stick-in-the-mud.
Josh |
Name: Kevin N.
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
<< I'm also not a fan of the zither score in "The Third Man," so go ahead, shoot me.>>
Is it just me, or did that score remind me of Woody Allen's BANANAS? |
Dear Kevin:
I don't hear the connection. "Bananas" is a Marvin Hamlisch Caribbean sort
of thing. The zither is just a zither.
Josh |
Name: Darryl Mesaros
E-mail: simonferrer102@yahoo.com
Dear Josh,
Well, when it posts it pours, I guess. My latest question is about the MASTERS OF HORROR series on Showtime, whether you've seen it, and what you thought of it. Having watched several episodes on Netflix (most of Season 1 has been uploaded so that you can watch it directly on your PC, without ordering the DVD), I have some mixed reviews. While I applaud the idea of taking some of the best directors of horror films and letting them showcase their skills, it's clear that some of the older directors are just not up to it anymore. Tobe Hooper's DANCE OF THE DEAD episode was disappointing, but then again his films have been disappointing since POLTERGEIST.
Still, some of the films are quite promising. I'm looking forward to watching Dario Argento's piece JENIFER, and Takashi Miike's IMPRINT was shocking.
A little more on IMPRINT (if you haven't seen it, I won't spoil it). Miike beautifully composed and shot his piece, and although the logic comes apart a bit at the end, the overall effect is generally eerie. There are also some EXTREMELY graphic sequences that are done with a certain disturbing realism. His treatment of taboo subjects (i.e., torture, abortion, incest, and so on) is absolutely frank and unflinching, and it was rumored that Showtime refused to air IMPRINT, but held it for the DVD release. I wasn't 100% for this piece, but some of the images are still stuck in my head.
Darryl |
Dear Darryl:
I haven't watched it.
Josh |
Name: Angel
E-mail: aesparz2@depaul.edu
Dear Josh:
The zither in "The Third Man" is so terribly innappropriate that it nearly ruins the entire movie. At least it's not as poorly imagined as that Giorgio Moroder score to "Metropolis". I hope the Master Print of that was fired into the sun. I heard recently that Brian DePalma turned down an offer to re-release "Scarface" with an all rap score. He stated something about not wanting to damage the integrity of his original work.
He's currently working on a prequel to "The Untouchables". |
Dear Angel:
You managed to both diss and praise Giorgio Moroder in the same paragraph,
sort of. I do think Moroder's score for "Scarface," though dated and silly,
is still perfectly appropriate to the time period and subject matter of the
film. The story is specifically set in a particular time, with the flood of
Cuban refugees in Miami, disco, and cocaine, so that rap would have no
meaning or place in the film. Is the prequel called "L'il Untouchables,"
with all of the characters as kids? Ten-year-old Elliott Ness against
ten-year-old Al Capone, with slingshots.
Josh |
Name: Darryl Mesaros
E-mail: simonferrer102@yahoo.com
Dear Josh,
I rather liked the jazz score in ANATOMY OF A MURDER; it seemed to me to give the film a comfortable feeling. Also, it rounded out Jimmy Stewart's character a little and made him more interesting, a little eccentric. Lee Remick's character comments on that in the film, to the effect that he has odd taste in music for a lawyer. Still, I suppose the pace could've been picked up a little in the second act.
Darryl |
Dear Darryl:
I have no issue with Stewart's character being a jazz fan, nor him going and
jamming with Pea-Eye (Ellington), but that doesn't mean the movie should
have a dramatic jazz score. Jazz on it's unconscious emotional level says
"Urban," whereas the film takes place in a small town in the upper
penninsula of Michigan; jazz, particularly Ellington's hot jazz, says
"Sophisticated," but it's a reasonably unsophisticated story of abuse and
rape, set in the middle of nowhere. The dramatic score sets the emotional
landscape for the story, and I simply think it's an inappropriate choice for
that film. I'm also not a fan of the zither score in "The Third Man," so go
ahead, shoot me.
Josh |
Name: Matt David T.
E-mail: msturnbull@comcast.net
Dear Josh:
A lot less people seem to be writing in these days, based on the size of the updates. Is that affecting you? |
Dear Matt:
It goes up and down, just as it has for the past nine years. I generally
have several Q&As every morning, but sometimes they're so meaningless or
dumb I don't bother answering them.
Josh |
Name: Darryl Mesaros
E-mail: simonferrer102@yahoo.com
Dear Josh,
It seems as if you've softened your view a little bit on DV, although I agree that it currently still has too many artistic and commercial restrictions to replace film at this time. Still, if the medium continues to develop, it seems to be the way of the not-so-distant future.
In an unrelated question, I watched ANATOMY OF A MURDER last night, and wondered what you thought of it. Apart from the fine performances (Jimmy Stewart was great when confronting Ben Gazzarra and wrangling in the courtroom with George C. Scott), the thing that I liked best about the film was Otto Preminger's style. He made all of his films from a very mature standpoint; his characters are adults, and he doesn't dance around or titillate over sexuality or real-life situations. In an era when it seems as if every film is ultimately made for teenagers, it was refreshing to see a film made by a grownup for a change.
Darryl |
Dear Darryl:
I liked "Anatomy of a Murder" much more when I was a kid, but the film has
not held up very well for me over the years. It seemed sluggish and lumpy
the last time I watched it. Even though I'm a fan of Duke Ellington, as is
Jimmy Stewart's character in the film, I don't think the jazz score fits the
setting or the action of the movie. And though I agree with you that Otto
Preminger was pushing motion pictures to be more mature, I think we was a
sloppy, thoughtless director.
Josh |
Name: Jason Roth
E-mail: scootermcgurk@yahoo.com
Hey Josh,
When can we look forward to the release of Rushes-and will you be doing any signings or appearances? I couldn't attend either of the Hammer screenings. It would be great to meet you, your Q&A and writings have always been caustically inspiring (I mean that as high praise.) I'm nearing the end of the road on my 7-years in the making feature. Learned a lot of lessons on this one.
You mentioned Hondo in 3D a while back- several years ago they aired it on network television in the "miracle of Naturalvision," where you could watch it with or without 3D glasses. You are right, 3D didn't add a damn thing to the movie. Somewhere I still have my free pair of Hondo 3D glasses with an Indian on the side of them. Good stuff.
Best,
Jason Roth |
Dear Jason:
I would of course be happy to do a book signing if I (or my publisher) could
get a bookstore to back it. The store has to order several boxes of books,
then advertise in some way. They don't do this unless they think they can
move the books. So, seven years into making a feature, eh? Where are you
along the path? What lessons did you learn?
Josh |
Name: Diana Hawkes
E-mail: upon request
Hi ya Joshie Poshie,
Last night I caught an episode of the documentary series "Secrets of the Dead" on PBS.
This one was called "Bridge on the River Kwai".
I had *NO* idea there were 96,000 people killed making that railroad; of which 18,000 were Allied POWs (the rest being Asian indentured "slaves")! Before watching this, I had the sense the Japanese were brutal, but that stunned me. The footage, stills, and details were horrific and brought to my mind what making The Great Wall Of China or the pyramids must have been like.
I was wondering if you've seen this because a directing choice caught my attention ... well, I don't know if it bugged me or if I liked it ... anyway I'd like to have your opinion. When they had filmed interviews with several POW survivors, they did rather extreme close ups but lighted their faces so that half was in complete shadow and the other side was bright enough to see one eyeball.
I was distracted and, as they were giving such devastating accounts and breaking down emotionally at key moments, I wondered why that would be the choice - to omit half their expression during the harrowing retelling.
Perhaps it was to set an ominous mood ... perhaps a symbolic visual that half of these men's souls remains back in the dark past, half in the illuminated present. I'm guessing.
I can't decide if it was a good move or not!
If anyone is interested, it's repeating again on many PBS stations at ~ 5 p.m. tommorrow (Saturday) night, and likely several more times throughout the month.
I know you're a PBS buff and the subject interests you, so I hope you'll catch it. |
Dear Diana:
No, I haven't seen that show, but it sounds interesting. I think you got
why they lit the close-ups as they did -- a half lit face is dramatic. It
was a specific lighting choice to give the close-ups more drama. Honestly,
how many ways can you film a close-up? And let's face it, we've seen them
all: all the way to the left, all the way to the right, centered, high, low,
hand-held, starkly-lit.
Josh |
Name: Darryl Mesaros
E-mail: simonferrer102@yahoo.com
Dear Josh,
Thank you kindly for wishing me well on the documentary project, as we certainly need it! In reply to your statement on Don Coscarelli, I have to say that I was impressed by his energy and his accomplishments. For one, he made his first feature, JIM THE WORLD'S GREATEST, and got it released by 20th Century Fox when he was only eighteen. Also, he brought Reggie Bannister and Angus Scrimm into the spotlight, whose performances I really enjoy.
Anyway, on to my real question. Recently, it seems that digital filmaking has enjoyed great technological improvements, which more and more render it viable as a new industry standard. True, digital filmaking hampers cinematography because of lighting and color reproduction problems, but these only seem to be temporary issues (much like the way that cumbersome early sound technology hampered camera technique). If these problems can be licked, then filmakers can make real use of the advantages of the technology (cheaper editing with instant feedback, no negative decomposition, etc.). That being stated, do you think that you will ever experiment with DV for one of your features in the future?
Darryl |
Dear Darryl:
If I had a suitable script and the only way I could get it going was to
shoot it super-cheap on DV, I'd happily shoot do it. However the last two
scripts I've written (both with Paul Harris), "The Horribleness" and "It's a
Lost, Lost World," both have big enough productions so that I wouldn't want
to go through the trouble of putting them all together, and not shoot them
on film. So, under the right circumstances, yes.
Josh |
Name: christopher bolender
E-mail: youearnedit@gmail.com
Dear Josh:
I'm a marine and I'm trying to pitch my script. Who do I contact? Are agents really impossible to get? And, what do you think about contacting everyone and their mother? |
Dear christopher:
I had eight agents over the course of 20-odd years in L.A., so they're
certainly not impossible to get, not by any means. Getting a good agent,
though, is a whole other issue. And "contacting everyone and their mother"
doesn't mean anything. You have to know who you're trying to get to before
sending your stuff or you may as well just put it straight in the trash.
But getting an agent is completely possible, you just have to hustle to make
it happen. Good luck. Semper Fi.
Josh |
Name: Harold
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
This is a three part question.
One: Do you ever get writer's block? If you do, how do you get past it. Do you have any tricks or anything?
Two: When you finish a script, who do you give it to read first? Who is your trusted group of peers who you always have give you feedback?
Three: Do you ever have friends give you their scripts to read and give input on? And have you ever done any uncredited rewrites for your friend's scripts? |
Dear Harold:
One: I consider not writing part of the process of writing, so I don't think
of it as Writer's Block. It's more like the bucket hanging on the side of
the Maple tree collecting the syrup -- once you pour it out, you then have
to let it fill again, drop by drop. I also believe that stories frequently
need to ferment in your head for some amount of time before they're ripe
enough to write. Just keep thinking about the idea of stories, and how one
event sets off another series of events, and think about dramatic
situations, not about "What will I write next?" or "Oh my god, I've got
Writer's Block." And keep a daily journal (I do), so then you're writing
everyday anyway, so how can you have Writer's Block.
Two: The first two people I usually get are my good buddies, Bruce Campbell
and Paul Harris, who have both been kind enough to read most every script
I've written. Since I wrote my last two scripts with Paul, we got Bruce and
Paul's buddy, Robbie, and of course my good buddy, Shirley LeVasseur, the
webmaster here. But then I elect others, too. My good friends, generally.
Three: No, not really. I really hate reading scripts, unless I'm going to
direct them.
Josh |
Name: David R.
E-mail:
Josh, just wondering if you've seen a British flick called Quadrophenia, and if so, can you recommend it? |
Dear David:
Yes, I have seen "Quadrophenia," and I also have the CD. I think it's a
very interesting, and almost successful, attempt at adapting the Who's album
into a movie, and I enjoyed it, too, but I don't think it's a great film. I
was expecting even better things from the director, Franc Roddam, after that
and never got anything. But yes, I do recommend the film. It's also
Sting's first film and he was surprisingly good.
Josh |
Name: Darryl Mesaros
E-mail: simonferrer102@yahoo.com
Dear Josh,
Sorry to pester you with a second post, but this didn't really fit with the other one I just sent. Anyway, here's my question: what do you think of the films of Don Coscarelli, and Mr. Coscarelli as a director?
Darryl |
Dear Darryl:
I was amused by the first half of "Bubba Hotep," mainly by Bruce and Ossie
Davis's performances. I was seriously underwhlemed by the "Phantasm"
movies, and "Beatmaster" wasn't much, either. Basically, I'm not
particularly impressed with him. Bruce said he enjoyed working with him.
Josh |
Name: Darryl Mesaros
E-mail: simonferrer102@yahoo.com
Dear Josh,
I haven't checked in for quite some time, and I wanted to give you an update on the documentary project, as promised. Currently, the subject we settled on (female kickboxers) is in post-production limbo, with one partner in London, another in Thailand, and me in Connecticut. This whole thing started when my friend John and I were with our National Guard unit in Afghanistan. John got two weeks leave and went to visit his buddy Thor, a British expatriate living in Pattaya, Thailand with his wife. One night, they were shooting the shit and got to talking about all the unusual things going on in Pattaya, and decided that they could make a documentary and possibly sell it. The idea stuck, and over the remaining months in Afghanistan, Thor and John worked out the details by email. I was brought into the project (despite my general lack of filmaking knowledge) because both Thor and John are, by their own admission, more talkers than doers and needed a third man to round out the team.
Anyway, a few weeks after we got home from Afghanistan, John and I went to Pattaya and we started scouting out subjects to film. The plan was to make documentaries for television, so we were able to go with HDV, which turned out to be a much cheaper option than film. Our setup was very basic: one Panasonic camera and one Sony backup, one tripod, one poor man's steadicam rig for handheld work, John as the Director and DP, me doing gaffing and sound, and Thor doing interviews, voiceover narration (he's been on TV in before in the UK, and has a good screen voice and presence) and using his local contacts to get us subjects. Sound was very simple. We couldn't afford a mixing board or any type of portable rig, so we used the onboard shotgun mike on the panasonic to get ambient and crowd sounds, and rigged a directional mike on a long cord to plug directly into the camera for interviews and dialogue. On alot of our work, I'm just out of frame handholding the microphone, which worked surprisingly well. We played with exposure in the camera to make maximum use of natural light, and found through experimentation that our editing software could do color and light correction to give us decent, professional looking visuals.
Our two main problems were getting permission to shoot different subjects, and finding an editor. For instance, we wanted to do a documentary on bar girls and Thai prostitution, but we couldn't find a bar that was willing to let us shoot (they were worried that the camera would discourage customers). Our greatest success came when Thor used his contacts to get us involved with two gyms teaching muay thai (kickboxing). The gyms were eager for exposure and gave us free reign to film training, practice, and matches. We managed to get alot of good footage, and we're trying to assemble the narrative now.
As for an editor, we did hire a Thai editor from the local TV station and while she was an experienced cutter, the language barrier was too great to convey what we wanted, even through an interpreter. Since then, Thor's been in touch with a fellow who has edited a few National Geographic subjects, but that's still in negotiation.
Will we sell the finished product? I hope so. If not, it was the cheapest working vacation I ever took, and the perfect way to decompress from Afghanistan.
Yours truly,
Darryl |
Dear Darryl:
Good luck with it, and welcome back. Getting movies made, any kind of
movies, is tough. Now you know, so the next one will be easier.
Josh |
Name: Dean
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
I watched Alien Apocalypse on D.V.D ( did you know it has U.K Distribution now ? )
Piece of crap is going a bit too far, but I of course respect Bruce Campbell's opinion.
Anyway for what it was I enjoyed it, it had a little bit of sly political satire, religious satire, it was witty and far better shot than most Sci Fi movies, certainly it has a cinematic quality not usually present in their stuff.
Sure it isn't Citizen Kane, the overdubbing and some of the acting and effects are terrible, but it works as a sort of Fifties B-movie pastiche/homage which I am sure was intended, it had a point to make, I thought it was ok, just a silly throwback to movies I enjoy.
Also the DVD is cheap and has a good commentary, it isn't your best film, but you are right to have a fair amount of pride with it, especially considering the production difficulties.
Was the Ivan cutting off limbs sequence a homage to Evil Dead 2 when Ash is cutting up the pee wee head ? |
Dear Dean:
No, it wasn't meant as an homage, at least not consciously. The film may be
a piece of crap, but I'm not ashamed of it. As far as Sci Fi Channel movies
go, I think it's pretty good.
Josh |
Name: Joseph St. Lloyd
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
You were saying there is an exception to every rule, so I was wondering what the exception to the rule is as far as good movies shot digitally? In your opinion, what is the best film shot with digital cameras and why do you consider it the best film?
Thank you for your time and I very much look forward to your answer. |
Dear Joseph:
I just read a review in the NY Times about a film called "Quiet City," that
they not only liked, but throught was beautifully shot on digital. So it
certainly can be done. I haven't seen Bruce Campbell's new film yet,
either, "My Name is Bruce," but it was shot high-def by our buddy the DP,
Kurt Rauf, and from everything I hear it supposed to look great.
Josh |
Name: Jimbo
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
If you go to Fangoria.com and click on their Radio button, I think it's the first interview there unless they added more.
It's 41 minutes. You should listen to it. It's funny. He only talks about AA and MWTSB for a few minutes. :( |
Dear Jimbo:
I've since spoken with Bruce, and he was referring to the cheesy productions
of both AA and MWTSB, which were pretty crappy. Anyway, I'm not interested
enough to listen to the interview, but thanks.
Josh |
Name: Jimbo
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
I'm not trying to rub salt on an open wound or anything, I'm just genuinely curious. Does it hurt you at all to hear Bruce call your movie crap?
I know you get a bunch of assholes on here saying "You suck!" and "You make horrible films!", so I know you're used to some backlash, but I would think coming from a friend of yours it might hurt a little.
Again, I'm not trying to hurt you or anything. I thought AA was a good enough film. Better than a lot of other films made these days. Especially for Sci-Fi. |
Dear Jimbo:
Since I never read that quote by Bruce, nor has he ever said such a thing to
me, I 'd be interested to know the context in which he said it -- not that
matters. Bruce has been my good friend for a very long time, and if he
thinks my film is crap, then it probably is.
Josh |
Name: John Hunt
E-mail: Chowkidar@aol.com
Josh,
Haven't written in a while though I've been reading and following developments here. "Xena" and it's related productions ("Herc," "Jack," "Cleo,")were engaging shows whose great commonality was a willingnest to explore form within an over-arching structure. I did not all of those series (Sorry Bruce, I liked you in "Jack" but the rest of the show not so much. Herc was much better and I always looked forward to it. Xena was even more so. There was only one way to know what the creative team would come up with next and that was to watch the show. And I wish folks who criticise your (Josh Becker's) contributions need to see the episodes that you actually directed. By watching those episodes one could call out which important outside films these jerk-weeds haven't yet seen yet which you reference throughout.
All of those shows took tremendous chances on funny budgets with strange schedules. I would have been proud to be able to claim to have been a part of that experience. Someday my kids will wish they could have seen it first-run too.
I am tremendously pleased for Bruce on Burn Notice He's on a funny, well-balanced show, the writing is great and age appropriate and it's doing well, so well that I finally got TiVo just to record it. Don't know when you might see him again but we think he's doing a great job.
As are you and Shirley. Thanks for keeping this Blog up and running. John |
Dear John:
Being a former "Xena" director does make me an easy target. I had a few
encounters with a movie journalist in L.A. who loudly disparaged my opinions
at a party because I directed "Xena." My response to him was, loudly, "I
may not be at the top of my field, but I'm not a parasite on the movie
business's ass, either, like you, for instance." The idea that some dipshit
journalist, who's never worked on a movie in any capacity, has a more valid
opinion than mine is utterly ridiculous. When I make a comment about
screenwriting it's based on having written 35 scripts over the past 30
years, five of which have been produced as movies. When a film critic
comments it's based on nothing other than having watched movies, and I've
done plenty of that, too.
Josh |
Name: August
E-mail: joxerfan@hotmail.com
Dear Josh,
In case you haven't heard, Alien Apocalypse is on Sci-Fi this Sunday (Sept. 2nd) at 11 AM EDT, preceded by Screaming Brain. And in other Bulgaria news, turns out your Harpies colleague Declan O'Brian is making his directorial debut on Renee O'Connor's movie, which she's shooting over there even as we speak.
While you've said we'll have to wait for "Rushes" to come out to find out the details on all the challenges you faced while filming Harpies, I'm curious - do you think you burned bridges with the whole network? Or just the individual producers for that film? (Since there seem to be a ton of different producers shooting things over there right now.)
Regards,
August
PS - did you ever watch the rest of "These Are The Damned?" Wasn't that just really jarring, to go from claustophobic, stereotypical Outer Limits-style interiors to these sweeping shots of cliffs, the ocean, helicopters, boats, high speed chases and so forth done on location in broad daylight? |
Dear August:
Thnaks as always for the update. The film with Renee is actually Declan's
second directorial effort. His first film hasn't aired yet. And he's done
shooting the second one, as well (I just spoke with him a few days ago, and
he's back from Bulgaria). No, I didn't burn any bridges with Sci Fi, I
don't think, other than I'll bet they were disappointed with "Harpies" and
they probably blame me for the shitty special effects. But I did manage to
burn my bridges with UFO, the studio in Sofia that makes about half of the
Sci Fi movies every year. The bottom line of these Sci Fi movies, though,
is that I don't think anybody gives a rat's ass who directs them, nor if
they're any good at all, just that they get delivered on time. Since a
whole aspect of Sci Fi's Saturday Night Movie is that it's supposed to be a
piece of shit, the kind of idiotic crap you would have seen at the drive-in
30 years ago, why bother getting a decent director?
Josh |
Name: Russ
E-mail: aurorapicturesuk@aol.com
Josh!
I spoke to you a few years ago on here when I was starting to make short films, they are going pretty well and I'm getting a bit of notice for them and a couple of awards. I have to say that I used to think I knew it all but then I just read your book and it has completely changed my outlook on film making. Its really well written and i cant believe how well you have broken down every stage of the production to make it manageable. This is the best book ever on the subject of film making. Thank you so much. I've completely rewritten my screenplay with your ideas in mind and its turned into something much better than I expected. Do you ever make short films? I feel that the book, made for features, can be so well translated into shorts. Just wondering really if you have any plans to impart your wise knowledge about short films? If you have any tips for my shoot next week that would be great.
Yours sincerely
Russell Gomm - England |
Dear Russ:
I'm pleased you got something out of my book. Yes, most of it applies to
shorts as well as features. I haven't shot a short film in a long, long
time; I focus exclusively on features now. Here's my advice: plan all of
your shots in advance, and think about where the cuts will be. Any director
who doesn't do this, in my opinion, is a lazy hack.
Cheerio,
Josh |
Name: Jeff
E-mail:
Josh,
I was referring more to the clunky phrasing aspect. Has the editing process made you more aware of writing tendencies you have that might be considered "bad"? Did the professional eye show any things you weren't aware you were doing or was it more of "add a comma here" type of changes.
On a unrelated note - I recently saw "Lord of War" and thought it did a good job of educating me on a subject the director/writer obviously felt strongly about without being preachy. I can't remember the last "issue" film that did that.
Ok, here's the question - I felt "Lord of War" successfully used voiceover narration by integrating it throughout the movie, rather than just at the start and end of the film as a lazy way to kick start the action. Do you know of any other films you could recommend that do a good job using narration? Other than the obvious(i.e. Sunset boulevard)
Thanks! |
Dear Jeff:
Seemingly, my biggest English issue was the use of the word "which," which I
used far too many times. I then had to go on a "which" hunt and remove as
many of them as possible. Otherwise, my writing seemed to hold up pretty
well. I could go five, six or sometimes seven pages without a correction,
then there'd be a bunch on one page, then five more pages without any. As I
said, I like having an editor go over my prose. The use of voice-over
narration has become somewhat ubiquitous over the past ten years, and
generally I don't like it. It seemed to come into fashion in the 1940s with
the Raymond Chandler/Phillip Marlowe detective movies, like "The Big Sleep"
or "Lady in the Lake," and the true-life docudramas like "The Naked City"
("A cop doesn't spend most of his time running down hunches, he runs down
his shoe leather . . ."). But there's been some well-conceived, creative
uses of VO narration, like "A Clockwork Orange."
Josh |
Name: Wannabe Raimi
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
I was just wondering how you and Sam Raimi compare as directors? What things do you do similarly, what things do you do differently? |
Dear WR:
I can't make the comparison, someone else has to. I've never really been
directed by Sam, nor have I been on one of his sets since "Army of Darkness"
about 15 years ago, and then I was just an extra. I would think that he and
I work very differently, though, since we've always worked on completely
different schedules. Sam had about 6 months to shoot this last Spider-Man
movie; I generally have 3 weeks to shoot my films. I've never had more than
4 weeks ("Lunatics"); and Sam has probably never shot a feature in less than
10 weeks, and occasionally has had as much as 15 or 20 weeks. So I have no
idea what anything like that's about. When I'm shooting I usually go at the
top speed humanly possible, and that's probably not the best way to work.
Josh |
Name: Jeff
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
For most of your recent movies it seems that you have edited your own scripts without much outside input. If true, now that you are having books published, how has the experience of having a professional editor reviewing your written work been? Good, bad, indifferent? |
Dear Jeff:
I really had to think about that for a minute. Are you referring to the
editing of spelling and grammar, or to comments leading to rewrites?
Whenever I write a script I always get people I trust to read it and give me
their comments, then I either address them or not. Regarding the books, the
editor is really only going after poor grammar, clunky phrasing, or the
repitition of words, he's not making overall rewrite comments. I must admit
that I've always kind of enjoyed having an editor clean up my grammatical
messes. The editor and I just finished the editing process on my next book,
"Rushes," and I liked it. It's never easy getting useful notes on a script,
that's why you have to cherish and coddle the people who will actually go to
the trouble of reading your screenplays, then give you honest, useful
comments.
Josh |
Name: Anthony Palmer
E-mail: relap@nlc.net
Dear Josh:
In a recent Fangoria interview Bruce called "Alien Apocalypse" a piece of crap. How do you feel about him denigrating this film? I actually enjoyed the film quite a bit, as it was simply fun to watch. I also felt that the special effects in "Alien Apocalypse" weren't nearly as shitty as those I usually see in Sci-Fi productions.
Best regards,
Anthony |
Dear Anthony:
I'm glad you enjoyed it. Bruce can think what he likes. If it didn't have
such crappy dubbing, costumes and beards I might defend it. As far as Sci
Fi Original films go I think it's pretty good, but that's not really saying
all that much in the scheme of things.
Josh |
Name: Trey Smith
E-mail: cobra_commander_of_cobra@yahoo.com
Dear Josh:
I just finished reading the William Wyler biography "A Talent for Trouble" and I must say that it's very sad that so few know of Wyler these days. I've seen many of his films (though not all yet)and the fact that everything about them seems so "right" never ceases to amaze me. His direction was always invisible, as many like to say, and yet it was still distinctly a William Wyler Film. And as you said in your ode to him, his oeuvre has such variety. Throughtout the history of film there haven't been many directors like Wyler and I'll say again that it's very sad that not many people know of him. However, people will always know of his films and I think he would have preferred that more than anything. |
Dear Trey:
As my friend Paul and I were discussing yesterday, directors like Wyler or
Hitchcock or Ford, who didn't write their own scripts, were in fact every
bit as much auteurs as any filmmaker's ever were because they searched out,
found and developed their material, intentionally seeking stories that put
across their point of view. Wyler didn't write "Mrs. Miniver," "The Best
Years of Our Lives" or "Friendly Persuassion," but they're all very similar
pieces of drama, about the impact of war on a family. Or "Fort Apache" and
"The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance," as examples for Ford, that tell totally
different stories with exactly the same point -- history decides who the
heroes really are, not the truth. Hitchcock is the most blatant example
because he was constantly trying every way he could to keep approaching the
concept of suspense, and he didn't write any of those scripts. But he
developed them, as did Wyler and Ford. The scripts were written to their
specifications. Then you had director-writers like Billy Wilder, John
Huston or Howard Hawks, who knew what their themes were and kept writing
them into their scripts. As Hawks said, "When I watch a film, I want to
know who the devil made it." He didn't necessarily mean camera style, he
meant thematically. But now, for the most part, directors are just included
into packages put together by talent agencies.
Meanwhile, getting back to William Wyler, his best friend John Huston said
of him, "He had great taste," and that's ultimately what it's all about.
Josh |
Name: JB
E-mail: sotto1@yahoo.com
Dear Josh:
Your comments on Private Ryan (Speilberg can't tell a story) are laughable... Especially coming from the hack director of Zena: Warrior Princess. In order to save you further embarrassment you might want to take them off your website. What a maroon. |
Dear JB:
My comments and criticisms of "Saving Private Ryan" are perfectly logical,
and you haven't done anything to dispute them. I find your comments
laughable. And why anyone would believe that the opinion of a "hack"
director of Xena (that's with an X, not a Z, you moron) are any less
meaningful than a film critic who knows nothing about screenwriting or
filmmaking continues to befuddle me. I feel no embarrassment, I assure you.
Josh |
Name: Bob
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
You have given your views on religion. Where do you see religion going in the future? The next 50 100 200 years. Do you think it will gradually vanish? Will it decline but always hold onto a certain percentage of humanity due to some psychological predisposition in some people? As far as the major religions go, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, will some of these decline while others expand? Just wondering what your take on this is.
This weekend's movie line up for me is 'In Which We Serve' and 'Hondo'. |
Dear Bob:
I don't see religion going anywhere in the future but where it is.
Five-sixths of the world's population is religious, and I don't think
that'll change. Most people are afraid of death, afraid of mystery, and
need something "spiritual" to cling to, otherwise they're only stuck with
themselves. Most everyone wants to believe that their actions will somehow
affect their outcome, as opposed to the idea that life is merely chaos and
random confusion, and when you're dead you're dead. I think that people
particularly want to believe that there's more to life than the painful
insignificance that life appears to be, and the half-assed attempts most of
us have made at making the most out of our lives. Due to this, religion will
be with us as long as there are fearful humans, which is always.
Meanwhile, both of those films are worth seeing, although neither one is
great. "In Which We Serve" is probably primarily remembered because it's
David Lean's first co-directing credit, since he had to step out of the
editing room and bail Noel Coward out, who didn't really understand cinema
or editing. It's also young Richard Attenborough's first film. "Hondo" is
a good John Wayne western (shot in 3-D), and an early film produced by John
Wayne's company, which was originally Wayne-Fellows, then it became Batjac.
I like the writing of "Hondo," based on a Louis L'Amour novel. I actually saw it in 3-D and it added nothing to the proceedings.
Josh |
Name: carlon
E-mail: brandedwolf63@wmconnect.com
hello mr becker
im wanting to make a western movie but im needing investers to help out do u know of any or can u point me in the right direction to find any |
Dear carlon:
Your best bet is to mooch as much as you can off your parents and relatives.
Use guilt, act pathetic, pitch a fit, do what you must. Or don't. Good
luck.
Josh |
Name: CD
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
I read and liked your book on filmmaking. It seems to really get into what other 'filmmaking' books just skim over.
I always believed and agree that restrictions in 'art' are good, especially movies. I just heard Sydney Pollack say the same thing on a show about the industry on MSNBC.
I think in the least, restrictions (budgetary ones anyway) make you focus on the script/story more.
Now a question, how many shots should make up a scene? I know certain scenes could be done in one shot (a 'oner' as you call it), but on average, how many shots should make up a scene? Is there a 'rule of thumb'?
By the way, it seems 2 perf Techniscope may be making a quiet comeback. Aaton, Arri and even Panavision all have 2 perf movements available for their cameras. |
Dear CD:
I'm glad you liked my book. I'm also pleased to hear that 2-perf
Techniscope is making a comeback, it's a logical, terrific format that gives
you 20 minutes on a 1,000 foot roll of film, as opposed to the usual 10
minutes. As for how many shots should be in a scene, it entirely depends on
the scene. If you have ten people in a room talking for four pages, it
could take 50 shots to cover it all. Everything, in my opinion, is
subservient to the scene, and what you feel the scene needs to come to life.
Can it be covered in a oner, or does every person need a close-up? Or will
two-shots of each group be enough? You the director must decide, given your
schedule and budget, and what seems important. The ultimate answer is,
there's no rule of thumb because all scenes are different.
Josh |
Name: sandeep singh
E-mail: sandeepnamdhari@yahoo.co.in
Respected Sir
i am 25 graduate from india .i have a idea for internatonal label film .Indian history is very old like EYPUT so naturaly there are many inncident happend and some brave are people involve in these incidents and faced most difficult situtions like(TROY film)and many more english movies sir i wish to make a film for these people i have a idea and u have experience like that movies .i know indian history so i can help u lot .I just cannot explain my idea i need some time .if u interseted in me contact me MY EMAIL IS sandeepnamdhari@yahoo.co.in
|
Dear sandeep:
It's such a tempting offer, but alas I must decline. Good luck to you.
Josh |
Name: Maria
E-mail: xenaiya@yahoo.com
Dear Josh,
Don't pay attention to what Dilyana has written (for Bulgarian Impressions). Someone has something crawled up her ass. Bulgarians aren't that bitchy. I know, because I am one.
Take care. |
Dear Maria:
I've liked most of the Bulgarians I've met so far. The essay was just my
impressions, for goodness sake. It seems like there's someone out there
ready to take offense at most anything. My favorites are still the folks
who seriously defend sequels and remakes, whom I fondly think of as the
Unoriginal Thinker's Club. Angry Bulgarians are nice change of pace.
Josh |
Name: August
E-mail: joxerfan@hotmail.com
Dear Josh,
How did that most recent screening of "Hammer" go, and the Q&A afterwards?
And while I'm at it, in the words of Porky Pig to Marvin the Martian, Happy B-b-b-b-irthday, you b-b-b-b-thing from another world, you!
Regards,
August |
Dear August:
Thanks Porky old pal. Thus begins the last year of my first half-century.
I guess I didn't manage to kill myself before I got old, so I've got that
going for me. Meanwhile, the screening went very well. The projection was
good, the audience paid attention and laughed at all the jokes, then had
bright, interesting questions afterward. We could have easily kept the Q&A
going another half hour had we not been kicked out of the theater.
Josh |
Name: Jeff Alede
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
Have you seen the recent indie noir flick, "Brick"? I really dug it. It's basically a noir set around a modern-day high school. I know that may sound odd, but they really pulled it off. I might add that it was an impressive debut from Rian Johnson, with a budget less than $500,000. They smoke in it, too (actual cigarettes). |
Dear Jeff:
Sounds interesting, I'll keep my eyes peeled, like bananas.
Josh |
Name: Man From Seattle
E-mail: I love you.
"Well, quit smoking or fly to America to buy from the unfucking cigarettes."
I don't like making fun of how others say things in English when it's not their first language ... because you know, in Bulgarian I would suck much more balls, but I have to comment on the quote.
First, how can cigarette, or anything for that matter, unfuck someone? I understand how somebody can be fucked, but never unfucked ... the word unfuck just makes me smile to think about. Second, you're not suppose buy some of these magical unfucking cigarettes, but you're supposed to buy from them. I imagined a box of unfucking cigarettes running a vending machine on the streets of New York City right next to a hot dog guy.
Oh god, I'm gonna love this forever. |
Dear MFS:
Ah, the transliteration of an angry Bulgarian.
Josh |
Name: K.
E-mail:
Josh,
My favorite musicals are MY FAIR LADY and HAIR.
What was the last (as in latest) musical that you liked? |
Dear K.:
It might very well be "Hair." I do like that film a lot, but over the
course of time Milos Foreman's direction seems too dull and flat-footed for
the subject matter. But I like a lot of musicals, like: "West Side Story,"
"The Sound of Music," "Cabaret," "An American in Paris," "Singin' in the
Rain," "Gigi," etc. I was just listening to the broadway soundtrack of "My
Fair Lady," with Rex Harrison and Julie Andrews, and it's still a crime she
didn't get the part in the movie. I also wish that the movie of "My Fair
Lady" had been shot on location in England, instead of in Hollywood,
entirely on sets.
Josh |
Name: colin cunliffe
E-mail: lencol1@hotmail.com
dear josh,
my son elton sebastian was shot and killed in bogota on the 28.6.07.he always looked up to you ,this is part of page 68,
Name: Elton Sebastian
E-mail: eltonsebastian@yahoo.com
Hi Josh,
I've been following your career for quite some time now. You have inspired me, to write, direct and shoot my own movies.
I've read your scripts and your essays. And in them has been valuable information that no Film School professor has ever shown me.
My last short 16mm Film, Nerd Wars, won several awards Sunday before last in Miami. A few cable stations have offered to show it and I'll soon have it up on the net, and showing at other festivals around the US.
I know you must be extremely busy, but It would be a great honor to have you as a mentor.
its a sad time for me ,but could you put it in your q&e
as i know a lot of his friends read this and may be they can get in touch.
thank you for your time,i have a web page if his friends would like to light a candle.
http://www.gatesofremembrance.com/main/tribute/index.php?id=2470&music
Colin cunliffe
Eltons dad
|
Dear colin:
I'm so sorry for your loss.
Josh |
Name: Dilyana Zlateva
E-mail: international2@gmail.com
Dear Mr.Becker,
Allow me to comment on your "Bulgarian Impressions." My name is Dilyana Zlateva and I live 30 km. away from our capital Sofia, where you were shooting.
It really warmed my heart, the way you tried to make fun of every little thing you saw on less than 5 sq.km. for I guess about 2 -3 weeks, and how generously you stamped it - Sofia, Bulgaria, the Bulgarians, the children etc.
But first things first:
-Bulgarians are not stupid, because they don't have AC, although most places here don't. Most of us happen to survive on ridiculously small amounts of money. I am glad, that you find that so amusing.
-Difference, even in terms of parks, gardens etc., is a good thing. I applaud your need to write about it. And "the plates piled with some sort of stinky little gray fried fish, sort of like herring or smelts", which you haven't tried are part of the national cuisine, good that we have one. Hotdog as national dish does sound better.....riiight!
-It seems to you, "that most Bulgarians over a certain age, say 35 or 40, frown all the time. Life just seems like a bitch to them". Hey, very observant, OR "Maybe they're all constipated". How brilliant! And I do mean that. When you learn to survive on 80 levs (40 dollars) a month, like some of "them" do, you are, please, welcome to feel the need to write new "impressions".
- You seem to have had problems with the Cyrillic alphabet. I suppose, that was also a bad impression and all fault goes to the Bulgarians, no doubt. Just for your information, young people in Bulgaria, and Sofia especially, are very good linguists, English included. When I travel abroad, and I often do, I don't expect people in Holland to speak Bulgarian now, do I? But, hey, English is maybe special and we are all to learn it. So says the law! We are criminals, I admit. And you couldn't remember the name of the street...Ops, our fault again.
- Stray dogs. And they roam free. I know - it is so easy to just humanely euthanize them.
- Dutch and fun. I have been all over Holland and those two words are only to be used separately. Bulgarians find fun in every little thing they do. We take the time to chat with our friends are family. We enjoy sitting in the park and eat stinky zaza and drink Kamenitza. And at night we throw the biggest parties and have great time. But maybe you should be loud and pretentious all the time to show, that you have a great time.
- And by the way - Che Guevara and James Dean...Wow - that is so far from the truth in Bulgaria. That was just Ivo, the driver, thinking.
- I am glad to know your opinion of "even" Korean, Pakistani or Arab store owners in America. Spooky!
- There’s a real pissed-off, angry streak in these Bulgarians. Damn right! Good, that you became an expert on Bulgarians in just about a minute, and that you put all eggs in the same basket.
- These people would rather take less than the item costs than have to make change. And cab drivers simply won’t make change at all. Shoot them! What a place!
- Every other TV channel has people dressed up in local native garb singing and dancing to Bulgarian folk songs, because we take pride in our heritage and we do have a history, "a biiiit" longer than say... 200 years. Then there’s another channel that’s entirely programmed with cheap documentaries about what a great place Bulgaria is. From it’s mountains to it’s seas . . . How cute to write impression on something you have never seen. Very mature. And yes, Bulgaria is a great place. And yes, Bulgaria is a liiiiiitle more than Sofia-Centre. And yes, there is no such thing as cheap American propaganda about what a great nation America is and how it should poke its nose into every nation's business.
- After three weeks here in Bulgaria you are growing very weary of the whole damn thing. Well, then go shoot in Germany. It’s a drag never understanding what anyone is saying. Well, learn at least 2 sentences in Bulgarian. People are occasionally talking derogatorily about you, or about Americans in general. Well, they have pretty good reasons to. Meanwhile, you can’t smoke anymore of those fucking horrible Bulgarian cigarettes. Well, quit smoking or fly to America to buy from the unfucking cigarettes.
- "I completed my first week of shooting." No kidding. Your comments were more like you have been here for like 5 years.
- You just walked across “the garden” or park, as you’d call it, to go to the nearest big market about the size of an American liquor store, yet has a bit of everything. And you spent between 20-30 leva and that apparently made you one of the very big shoppers they ever saw. Undoubtedly this is because they’re poor. My dear, Bulgaria has more super cool cars per capita than America. Your opinion of yourself is flying higher than the US flag on the White House.
- And now: The Bulgarian character in a nutshell. Ta-da: "the first time you ask for anything their response is, “It’s impossible.” When you ask again, the response is an impatient, “Of course,” which is then promptly ignored. The third time you must yell it at them and then they’ll begrudgingly do it." Should I laugh or should I cry?! Next time (and hopefully there is never a next time - for our sake), pick your staff better. This is just a testament to your incapability to choose the people you work with.
Just shoot this goddamn movie already, and may the plane make a turn to Frankfurt next time! You undoubtedly have enough bucks to shoot there.
'Blagodarja'. Oh, it's the same like the English 'Funk you'. Gotta be amused!
Regards,
Didi Zlateva |
Dear Dilyana:
Who's got a bug up their ass? And are we just a tad defensive or what? I
think you prove my point about the Bulgarian angry streak. I did finally
eat the za-za fish, and they really are as nasty as they smell, too.
Josh |
Name: extreme
E-mail: extreme1982@hotmail.it
Dear Josh:
Hi!Please could you tell me, where the Movie Alien Apocalupse was made?
thank
goodbye |
Dear extreme:
Sofia, Bulgaria. For more info, read "The Making of 'Alien Apocalypse'."
Josh |
Name: Tim
E-mail: Nansemondnative
Josh,
We have discussed Kubrick's "The Shining" before but I have another question about it.
I was watching it again a little while ago and there is this part...
Jack - " Wendy I have let you fuck up my life so far but I am NOT going to let you fuck this up!"
This happens after the shit has basically hit the fan with the young beauty turning into the old decaying woman in room 237. Jack goes back after clearly being freaked out and tells Wendy he saw nothing. He then blames it on Danny's psyche and goes off the deep end when Wendy suggests leaving The Overlook and seeking a safer haven.
Jack then storms out of the room and therein lies the question.
As Jack is leaving Wendy he walks right past the camera and looks directly at it with that hateful look on his face.
I don't see that tool used much and when I do it is usually in a comedy like Darrin McGavin sitting at the dinner table in "A Christmas Story" describing how the puzzle he is working on could be "worth $50,000 dollars".
Why do you think Kubrick had Nicholson look at the camera on that shot? We could already see Torrance was well off his rocker and pissed off. Could Nicholson have improvised it? Even then it breaks that rule of not looking at the camera.
I hope this isn't an "out there" line of questioning.
What do you think?
Tim |
Dear Tim:
I don't remember the moment off hand, but most anything that's considered a
"rule" in filmmaking, Kubrick tried to break at some point or another. Then
again, Nicholson might well have improvised it, and Kubrick liked it when he
saw the footage. But unlike most directors, Kubrick really did seem like he
had everything worked out the way he wanted it, then made damn sure to get
it no matter what the actors thought. As I've mentioned before, both "The
Shining" and "Full Metal Jacket" are films that I think keep improving with
age, like fine wine, whereas most films age like fish.
Josh |
Name: Nick
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
OK, I finally tracked down a copy of your book. I haven't read it, but I'll let you know what I think. I have been reading through your website, and I think I got the whole idea of "theme" down. The theme is the general idea behind the story that reflects each character's motivation (so if the theme was loyalty, for example, the main character's actions would perhaps be motivated by his loyalty to another person or organization, or outright lack of it), and each character's motivation is their "point." Is that right?
Anyways, I was perusing the archives (I'm trying to memorize everything you have to say about screenwriting, since you seem to be the only person who knows what he's talking about), and was especially interested in your thoughts on Spielberg and his prevailing "inner-child" philosophy. I believe the reason this ideology has become so prevalent in our society is because many people, particularly Spielberg (and Michael Jackson) are desperate individuals who believe the only time in their lives they were really happy was when they were children. I think most people seem to have misinterpreted happiness for the bleary-eyed sense of amazement most children have (which does indeed seem to fade somewhat as routine, monotony, and social pressure become more prevalent in life) and subsequently have a sense of esoteric nostalgia, and think the only times in their lives they had imaginations or creativity was when they were kids. I think it's all horse shit.
I recently watched an interview with Spielberg and couldn't have been any more embarrassed for him; every other word that came out of his mouth was "childhood" and "imagination;" as if all children were gay. Most children, from what I remember, are mean, snotty, and very violent ferret-like creatures who don't resemble anything close to the purely "innocent" children in "Peter Pan" (which I was forced to read as a child, and thought it was incredibly lame). For someone like me, who started developing more mature intellectual interests by the time I was 13 (I had read most of Harlan Ellison's books by that point, for example, and thought "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" was WAY more imaginative and cool than anything Spielberg could come up with), whereas most people my age (I'm 22) seem to be still stuck in the miasma of Star Wars, comic-books, and superheroes (which always seemed really lame and didn't even interest me as a child), this prevailing notion in our society, and particularly in cinema, can be quite vexing. So you can at least take comfort in the idea that SOMEONE out there is more interested in making films dealing with mature subject matter and themes instead of faggy "superheroes" running around in codpieces.
An aside. Another interesting aspect of my childhood, I think, was that I was an adamant Christian and did, in fact, believe in Santa and the Easter Bunny. When I was about seven or eight, it slowly occured to me that these three things were, in fact, ridiculous and silly bullshit designed to pacify children (Santa is particularly disturbing because he comes off as a jolly old pedophile, constantly "watching" little kids and sneaking into their homes at night). It came as quite a shock to me when I started studying different religions as a teenager, and that most grown adults not only still believed in stuff that was equivocal to Santa and the Easter Bunny, but that they frequently killed each other over it! Life is weird sometimes, man. |
Dear Nick:
I'm with you, "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" was a much, much stronger
piece of imaginitive art than anything Spielberg has ever done or gotten
close to. I haven't read that story in over 30 years and it has completely
stuck with me. All this "inner-child" horseshit really gets me down. I'm
far more interested in my outer adult. And even though the late '60s and
early '70s were a particularly interesting time to have lived through, I
have no nostalgia, nor would I want to go back for one second, although I do
wish we'd all start making decent movies again. This whole Harry Potter
thing gets me down, too. When I hear that my seventeen-year-old nephew
spent two days locked in his room reading the new Harry Potter book it makes
me want to scream (and I have a mouth). The response is, "Well, at least
he's reading a book." Yeah? So what? By seventeen he ought to be reading
Hemingway and Fitzgerald and Cather, not kid's books. And if I diss Harry
Potter (and admittedly, I haven't read any of the books, I just saw about 30
minutes of the first film -- Yuk!), the response is generally, "Do you know
how much money she's made on those book?" Like that means shit, and makes
her books better. For 12-year-olds Harry Potter is fine; for 17-year-olds
it's pathetic. And if that's the only book a 17 year old reads, they may as
well not bother. I don't care how well those books may be written, they're
about weary, tired, flaccid, boring old concepts like wizards, witches and
sorcerers, and I didn't care about that crap when I was eleven. It really
is time for everybody to grow up.
Regarding theme, yes, you've got it, but it should not only relate to the
lead character, but every other character you can make it relate to. A good
theme covers every character, although it can (and should) bring them all to
different points about it. A theme brings a story cohesiveness, as well as
a point, and without those things a story is simply mush.
Good luck,
Josh |
Name: Jabba The Bruce
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
Why is it, do you think, that any series Bruce Campbell is the lead in (Brisco, JOAT) gets canceled, yet any show he's a supporting member of (Burn Notice, Xena and Herc; though technically these two are more recurring guest spots) go for several seasons? Do you think that Bruce suffers from the same curse as Ben Affleck, in which if he's the star, it's doomed, but if he's a supporting character it'll be praised to the sky? |
Dear Jabba:
"Brisco" and "Jack" just weren't the right shows at the right time, but
three hits out of five ain't bad. And let's all congratulate Bruce on "Burn
Notice" not only being a hit, well-reviewed, with consistently increasing
ratings, but it also got picked up for season two. Good on ya, Bruce!
Josh |
Name: Scott
E-mail: sspnyc66@mac.com
Josh,
With regards to Matt's comment on Kieslowski's "Red" from his color trilogy, I think that he needs to watch the other two to be less confused as "Red" was the last and connects the first two.
Oddly enough, everyone I know liked "Red" the best of all three with the exception of me. I thought "White" had the most solid and believable story and "Blue" came in second.
"White" also has Julie Delpy which is probably why I like it so much because I think she is one of the most beautiful actresses.
Anyhow, I did not know that you did not care for Kieslowski's color trilogy. Personally, I enjoyed the trilogy and it was after "Red" that I really started to notice the true decline in good films (I know you put the decline period much before that and I am not saying that these three films were great, but I think they were good films).
I also enjoyed his film "The Double Life of Veronique" and oddly enough, My girlfriend of 5 years at the time watched this film and I think it was the catalyst that tipped the scales in favor of her breaking up with me.
Talk about the power of a film. sheeesh.
Really, if you compare these films to what we have now even in foreign cinema, there is really no comparison with the exception of Mike Leigh's films of course.
Just my two cents. |
Dear Scott:
I didn't hate the films, they just left very little impression on me, other than pretty photography and pretty girls.
Josh |
Name: Bob
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
Do you read much Science Fiction, or do you think that S.F. is as good now as it used to be? For some reason, I don't seem to have the imagination for it that I once did. |
Dear Bob:
I stopped reading sci fi, other than some Harlan Ellison, over 20 years ago
so I don't know what it's like anymore. I generally don't read much fiction
anymore, either, although I am on my fifth novel by Philip Roth at the
moment.
Josh |
Name: Child of GOD
E-mail: taadal@yahoo.com
Dear Josh:
U see evil comes from negative people such as yourself. People tends to down talk people instead of helping and lifting there spirit up. We all are walking epistles cause we all have a story and if you are still alive your story hasn't ended yet.God is in charge of us all both good and evil. It's all for His pleasure not ours. That is what him GOD. We have children and discipline them when they don't obey by wooping, standing in corners,taking away there toy or game, t.v. radio and sometimes don't explain why because our children fear us (respect) They just deal with Like God is with us. So alot of us into different religions and tradition to fill that emptiness inside us that void. God keep alot of us blind because we are not mature enough in his eyes to understand all that is going on. Alot of people will never understand. Check out this minister Jim Brown he is from Tennessee he is an white man with an actual gift in God's word. But it only for the true believers that God called. If you don't get it you are one of the ones who is blind. Many are called few are chosen. |
Dear C of G:
Although I'm sure you make many valid and cogent points to yourself, sadly,
at least to me, you make no sense at all. English is clearly not your first
language. So, would you then say you enjoyed my essay, "Religion is Evil"?
Josh |
Name: claire
E-mail: rs_cyr@yahoo.com
Dear Josh:
Have you seen Bruce in his new USA Network series Burn Notice? He is a riot! Best new show this summer. Lucy will guest star in an episode on Sept. 13. It will be good to see them acting together again. |
Dear claire:
Yes, I've seen three of the first four episodes. I've enjoyed it, although
I must admit that the intensely formulaic quality, which is fundamental to
series TV, gets me down. However, all the reviews have been good, as well
as the ratings, so it may very well get picked up for a second season. I
just spoke with Bruce the day before yesterday and he's got two more weeks
then he's done shooting for the season. You go, Bruce-man.
Josh |
Name: Kurt Doelle
E-mail: lincdoelle@sbcglobal.net
Dear Josh:
I will be buying your book and do respect your work as a highly talented director.
Regarding your essay:
If you knew what is really going on in the Middle East and what went on under Reagan you wouldn't make so many general assumptions. Some facts you (I hope you will repsect)
# Despite what the media reports...
1. In reality there are over 400,000 CONFIRMED dead terrorists that were hell bent on killing you, me and every other U.S. citizen. These were the "filth" who applauded when the SECOND attempt at the WTC resulted in chaos. They were stopped dead on foreign soil rather than in Hollywood Hills or in your backyard.
2. Hussein (who ordered hits on three U.S. Presidents) is dead. His sons are dead, Chemical Ali is dead. Hussein's corrupt cabinet officals have all been dismebered or killed.
3. Seven (potentially disabling)terroist attacks have been thwarted since 911
This is no small feat! If Americans for one moment could reflect on the absolute terror these animals WOULD have inflicted upon our nation...they would stop writing childish essays and become appreciative of the effort, the sacrafice and the dedication of our troops and leadership. You are FREE to write your opinions...it was paid for by the blood of our troops
We are currently fighting an ideology-
This ideology (unlike conservatives & liberals)thrives on a fractured USA
This ideology beleives that their salvation is linked to our destruction.
Our president (like Lincoln) is under constant internal and external fire from the media.
Our President (like Lincoln) knows the results associated with failure.
When you safely write you next sophmoric essay in the quiet comfort of your home...consider the mandatory fight going on between some blood thirsty terrorist and some kid from some small town you've never heard of...Anyone who blows themselves up for salvation has no respect for their life...and even less respect for yours. This is your enemy and mine...Stick to directing
With respect and admiration for your work,
Kurt Doelle |
Dear Kurt:
400,000 dead terrorists? You're the biggest sucker who ever lived. Yes,
there are 400,000 dead Iraqis, of every age, sex, shape and size, Sunni,
Shiia, Kurd and Christian, but to believe for one second that they're all,
or even mostly, terrorists is as true as all Americans are Scientologists.
The only effort I will ever be appreciative of in Iraq is when our troops
come home. Our troops are there under completely false pretenses, and were
Saddam Hussein alive I'd happily give him his job back. Your talk of
"filth" and "animals," in my opinion, is what makes the world an ugly place,
and is very similar to the views of the Islamic terrorists toward us.
Although I do respect the fact that you think I'm a highly talented
director.
Josh |
Name: Matt Kerny
E-mail:
Dear Josh:
Do you like any of Krzysztof Kieslowski's films? I saw "Red", and although Irene Jacob is gorgeous and the direction is very nice, I thought the story itself was really... puzzling. Maybe I just didn't get it! |
Dear Matt:
I didn't like any of his color trilogy. I agree they look good, and the
gals in the leads were all pretty, but I didn't care at all.
Josh |
Name: Martha Elrod
E-mail: melrod43@aol.com
Dear Josh:
With your incessant comments berating Americans and their way of life:
[EX: Dear JGH: I don't think we have to worry about world peace. At any
given point in this world there are generally between 25 to 50 wars going
on, most about absolutely nothing. Humans are warlike creatures. It
would be nice to not kill each other over pure idiocy like our mythical
invisible god is more real and powerful than your mythical invisible god.
Instead, we can go to war and kill each other over real things, like oil,
which is the reason why we attacked Iraq (right after closing our military
base in Saudi Arabia), and the reason we never intend to leave Iraq. We
Americans would rather fight than conserve in any way. We kill for the
right to drive Hummers, heat our pools, and run our AC all the time.
Josh]
By all means let us know what you personally are doing to solve American's bloodthirsty ways and oh by the way, what do YOU drive? oh genius one. What are YOU doing to conserve--you pathetic Hollywood types make me puke. You sit around talking about film--you're not curing cancer, so quit denigrating America who gave you whatever spot of celebrity you gave, you ungrateful little prick.
Martha |
Dear Martha:
Americans are not quite 1/20th of the world's population, yet we use 1/3 of
everything, and we create 1/3 of all the pollution. If bringing up facts
like this denigrates Americans, and if we're displeased with terrorists
flying planes into our buildings, maybe we ought to try not being to biggest
pigs on the planet. We might also try not aggressively attacking countries
and occupying them just to steal their oil. I drive a mid-sized Chrysler,
but if I could afford a hybrid I'd buy it. As for being a "pathetic
Hollywood type," I live in Detroit, Michigan. Quite frankly, since Bush
came into office I have been downright ashamed of being an American. If
you're not ashamed, then you probably believe that Iraq blew up the WTC,
that we attacked Iraq to bring them democracy, that a half million Iraqi
lives don't equal 3,000 American lives, and that torturing prisoners is
perfectly okay and the American way.
Josh |
Name: Saul Trabal
E-mail: ghost_kingdom@yahoo.com
Heya Josh,
Nice to speak to you again-it's been a while. This is about one of our favorite writers: Harlan Ellison.
There's an article about a Harlan Ellison documentary called "Dreams With Sharp Teeth". Harlan is also interviewed here. The link:
http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=17991
And here's a quote from Harlan that had me rolling on the floor:
"Dea | | |