|
Name:
John Forde
E-mail: jforde40@hotmail.com
Howdy Josh-
Hey
Bill: To answer if I'm the "Mental" guy, all I can say
is no. I am mental ward material, if that's what you
mean.....
John
"They're Coming to take me Away" Forde
|
|
Dear
John:
I'm
glad you could straighten that out.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Dahlia Sweets
E-mail:
Hi Josh,
Do
you still have a friendship with Rob Tapert? If not,
I applaud you! In
your answer to Alan you write "I don't watch the show,
and I certainly won't be watching any from now on" in
referring to JOAT. Has your association with Ren Pics
affected your friendship with Bruce Campbell since he
is part owner of Ren Pics?
I
find it very sad that people fault you for following
your dream. I guess they would find it harder to bash
you if you had a couple blockbusters, and that says
well of their characters judging people by the size
of their wallets. I think it's a sad reflection of Xena
and some of it's fans.
At
least your episodes made me laugh. At least they were
just mindless TV as TV should be. People should understand
what a director does before they bash him. Afterall,
you directed, you didn't write, star in, and produce.
You
are right and Xena won't be remembered, and when someone
with the guts to put on a show about a strong female
Warrior with out the sterotypical lesbian shtick gets
a show aired, Xena will be a forgotten memory. Xena
has it because the Taperts pander to it, and it's ruined
the show. Yah, it still goes on, it still makes money,
doesn't mean it's any good. A hero going on adventures
is what Xena ought to be, not an acid religious trip
with storylines altered and twisted because of subtext.
I mean Callisto the father? Too much sense for Robbie
to go with a man as the father?
I
want to watch TV, I don't want it leaping out at me
telling me I have to applaud it and think it's the greatest
thing since sliced bread. Xena is too full of itself.
A problem of it's producer and actors perpetuating it.
I
wish you would tell what you really think of Xena and
the way they do business over there at Ren Pics. It's
not my business, but I sure would like to know what
a guy like you thinks of the whole Xena mess. Anyway,
Good Luck on your future projects.
Dahlia
Sweets
Ex-Xena Fan
|
|
Dear
Dahlia:
Actually,
Bruce isn't part of Ren Pix. He was originally, but
quit soon after "ED 2." Bruce and I get along fine.
Rob is a rich, powerful guy and it's a corrupting force
and almost no one is exempt. Rob, the Great White Shark,
thinks of me as little sucker fish (his metaphor) stuck
onto his back. He thinks that every job I've ever done
for him has been a personal favor to me, even though
I got no more than the minimum and someone was going
to have to do it. The fallacy of the Great White Shark
is that it believes a Great White Shark has anymore
value in the scheme of life than a sucker fish, which,
of course, if does not.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Tanya
E-mail:
Dear Josh,
Would
it be a comedy?
Thanks,
Tanya
|
|
Dear
Tanya:
The
first 30 minutes would be a slapstick comedy, then the
next 23 1/2 hours would be a horror film as the four
women try to escape the room where my dead body lies
rotting.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Lou Goldberg
E-mail: louisg@umich.edu
Dear
Josh:
Hey,
I don't know if you'll remember me but I met you a few
times some 20 years ago back when you Sam, Bruce, Rob,
and Scott had offices in Ferndale. I chanced on to your
web site and thought I'd say hi.
I
saw Lunatics-A Love Story and thought it was great--very
funny, very entertaining. I've seen Ted in all kinds
of things but this is his best performance.
I
still watch a lot of movies but never pursued movies
as a career. If you see Ted tell him hi from me, John
Arno, and Rich Hayes--we all remember him fondly.
|
|
Dear
Lou:
I
remember you, although it was long, long ago in a galaxy
far, far away. One of the other kids that used to hang
around that office, Jay Bliznick, now runs the Chicago
Underground Film Festival. That was a fun office and
a fun time. Good to hear from you and all the best.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Tanya
E-mail:
Hi Josh,
Do
you have a movie idea in your mind that would be your
ultimate fantasy to direct? If so, what would the story
be, who would it be written by, who would the actors
be, the music by, etc.? You could have everything you
could possibly want.
Thanks,
Tanya
|
|
Dear
Tanya:
It
would be a documentary called "Gang Bang" and would
star me, Michelle Pfeiffer, Helena Bonham Carter, Uma
Thurman and Gwyneth Paltrow, and it would be 24-hours
long.
Josh
|
|
Name:
bill
E-mail:
Dear
Josh:
After
reading more, I came up with more. I have to say, I've
learned more from this site than any other site. I have
yet to find a site I could learn more about film, let
alone all the trivial items brought to the table. I
can only thank you for the experience. One last thing:
there's not a damn thing wrong with a well written romance
novel...and they've accomplished getting it published.
|
|
Dear
Bill:
I
certainly never said anything against romance novels.
I worked in bookstores for years and sold hundreds of
them. As far as I'm concerned, anyone that reads books
is better off than anyone that doesn't read books, and
I don't care what kind of books they are. There is still
no denser form of information conveyance than books,
and the internet doesn't come close. And I'm glad you
like the site, Shirley and I do our best.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Bill
E-mail:
Dear
Josh:
I
just have a couple of comments. First off, I would have
to argue a little on the side of fan fiction. Although
I don't do this myself, I have seen some rather well
written ones. Although this is essentially a waste of
time since they won't sale them, I would think it would
be good practice and when they decide to move on in
life, assuming it includes writing, then they could
have mastered their skills. Ok, so this isn't likely
to happen, but it's possible. It's kind of like in grade
school when they made me write stupid ass personal experiences
in narrative form. Like I've had that exciting a life
by the 4th grade? However, I learned to use the same
story over and over again, all the way through college.
By the time I was in college I had the story down to
perfection. I could come up with bull shit description
with no problem. Not exactly the same but maybe you
can see some sort of point mixed in there. Now, role
playing games are something completely different and
defenseless....On a side note, the John Forde that frequents
this site doesn't happen to be the "Mental" guy? (that's
not an insult btw, but he would know what I was talking
about if it is).
|
|
Dear
Bill:
To
me "Fan Fiction" is like asking, "What if Gilligan had
sex with Mary-Ann?" which is a truly worthless endeavor.
This is basically people with too much time on their
hands that take TV too seriously. TV is, for the most
part, a night-light with sound. Most of what is shown
is visual and audio detritus (thank God for TCM, that's
all I can say). As to John Forde being the "Mental"
guy, he'll have to answer that one.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Annie
E-mail: Maryion@Hotmail.com
Dear Mr. Becker,
Thank
you for responding in a timely manner to my letter,
the explanation was apreciated... I'm sorry If My letter
was: Pushy, obnoxious, or annoying. It wasn't intended.
As
for the Fanfiction part, that you seem to think is a
disgusting waste of time, and if time is money, Money
as well, I've written fanfiction, I'm actually published
on many sites. The show you directed (Past tense, you
don't anymore) has stirred great emotions in the heart
of human kind, that is nothing to shun, or even call
stupid...
If
you want to see a waste of paper read a romance novel.
If you want to see a waste of internet space, look at
your site.
No
Questions, I'm just thanking you, and responding.
Annie
Princess of all Joxerness
Keeper of Joe's Coat
Founder of the SDoD
Founder of the JRF
|
|
Dear
Annie:
And
no one can ever say you wasted your life.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Jan Ouellette
E-mail: jjamo@net1plus.com
Dear
Josh:
I
understand Mr. Becker just did a Lycos chat where he
apparently indicated he would not be doing any more
Xena or RenPic stuff. Is he at liberty to explain further
why this is so?
|
|
Dear
Jan:
The
reason I got was that they were exclusively using New
Zealand directors from now on, as they cost half as
much money and don't get residuals. However, the first
two directors up on Xena were both Americans. I asked
Rob Tapert about this and he said that there would be
no comedies this season, and if they're only doing serious
ones, then I'm probably not the guy for the job.
Josh
|
|
Name:
ALAN
E-mail: picquickstudio@aol.com
Dear
Josh:
You
probably feel embittered at the way things have recently
gone at Renaissance but remember one thing.30 or 40
years down the line people not yet born will be watching
XENA on cable,satellite and other forms of medium as
yet undreamt of most likely.When they watch some of
these episodes they will see the name Josh Becker as
director and remember you with respect as one of the
individuals involved in the making of what will surely
be looked upon as one of the greatest genre TV shows
ever created.No-one can take that from you.Whichever
way your career progresses from now until then that
fact is a given.
|
|
Dear
Alan:
Thanks
for the vote of confidence. You really think people
will give a rat's ass about Xena in 40 years? I highly
doubt it. 40 years ago everybody thought "Rawhide" and
"Wagon Train" and "Have Gun, Will Travel" were the bee's
knees, now nobody gives the slightest shit. TV is a
disposable medium. If you enjoy the show, that's great,
but I don't see it as my claim to fame or immortality.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Annie
E-mail: maryion@Hotmail.com
Dear Mr. Becker,
I
see that being nice gets you no where when It comes
down to writing to you!
What
can I say, I've been nice, I've been a Jerk, I figure
this time that I'll just be myself, the best thing I
can be.
So,
Mr.Becker, or shall I call you Josh? Anyway. I was wondering,
why you seem to hate the Xena fans so much? I mean,
as said above this "No Ligit question will go unanswered"
So I'm Just asking. What do you have against us. I mean
we didn't do anything. Or did we? I really don't know,
I'm a little out of the Xena circle. I'm sure that you
have a few snide comments you can say to me, and all
of my Xenite friends.
I
just want to know, why do all the directors seem have,
well a major attitude problem? Wait, I just Gernalized
all the directors in Hollywood, just like you generalize
all the Xenites. So I'm just being a little hypocritcal.
Oh well, that seems to happen to me alot, I do that,
become hypocritical. So Hun, why do ya hate us so much!?
There just has to be a story behind this!
It
would be apprectiated.
Thank You
The Ever courtious (NOT to mention Stubborn) Annie
|
|
Dear
Annie:
I
don't hate Xena fans, I just can't stand obnoxious,
pushy people no matter what their affiliations are.
I am a big fan of many things, but I don't have to kid
myself believing that I have something to do with the
creation of these things. What the online Xena fans
think of the show is of no meaning or value to the making
of the show. Writing long analysis of plots, "fan fiction"
and poems about the characters of a TV show is a silly,
stupid waste of time, and the people that do such things
are not worth listening to. As I've said before, the
online Xena fans don't amount to 1% of the viewing audience,
so who cares what they think? Not me. Not to mention
that I'm not working on the show anymore, so cares what
I think? Xena's old news anyway and will more than likely
will end at the end of this next season. I certainly
don't "hate" the online Xena fans, I'm just bored by
them and do not need anymore pushy, obnoxious letters
from any of them.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Peter
E-mail:
Hi Josh,
How
do you get yourself in the mood to write a script? Do
you write in the morning, or in the evening? Do you
listen to music when you write? And lastly, do you have
any favorite writing books that you can recommend to
those of us aspiring to become screenwriters? Thanks
so much.
Peter
|
|
Dear
Peter:
I
write everyday whether I'm working on a script or not.
If I'm actually writing a script (which I'm not at the
moment) there's really very little else I want to do.
If you've outlined your story and know what each scene
is supposed to be about and know what your ending is,
sitting down and writing it isn't a problem, at least
not for me. But if I don't know where I'm going than
it's something of a horror. The process of writing is
not the same process as thinking up the story. The story
should be worked-out by the time you're writing the
script. I can write any time of the day or night, although
I prefer the middle of the night because it's quiet.
I listen to jazz or classical while I write. As for
recommended reading, first would be my six structure
essays. Syd Field's screenwriting book seemed both
reasonable and short, I've never read Robert McKee's
book but sounds good, Lajos Egri's "The Art of Dramatic
Writing" was very important to me as a writer, but it's
old and not necessarily easy to read.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Peter
E-mail:
Hi Josh,
In
making an Independent film with a VERY, VERY LOW budget,
what aspect of the film is the most important element
(besides the script) in producing a product that looks
more expensive than it actually is? Thanks.
Peter
|
|
Dear
Peter:
Well
thought-out shots and cutting, as well as good lighting.
I think a good example of a nicely conceived, well-shot,
cut and lit low, low-budget picture is "Pi." Not having
much money for the set on "Pi", Mr. Aronofsky uses black
very wisely--meaning, if something doesn't look all
that good, don't light it. Very little light will hide
many sins. Beyond any of this, get the very best actors
you can find. Bad acting will kill your film quicker
than anything else.
Josh
|
|
Name:
bill
E-mail:
Dear
Josh:
Have
you had any experience or what's your professional opinion
on a 35mm Arriflex 35-IICB camera package with 25mm,
50mm, 75mm Lenses, Matte Box, Two 400' Magazines, Hi-Hat,
Constant Speed Motor, Power Cables, Batteries and Case.
It's only 150 a day so I'm looking at it closely. Thought
I'd see what you had to say before I make a final decision.
Thanks.
|
|
Dear
Bill:
The
Arri 35-2CB is an older model camera, mainly used for
high speed shooting, although with the constant speed
motor it will run in sync at 24fps, but, if I recall
correctly, it's one noisy son of a gun. You need to
hear what it sounds like with it's sync motor and try
putting a blanket over it to blimp the noise. I don't
know how much sync footage you intend to shoot, but
if it's a lot and there are many interiors where the
camera noise will be amplified, it may not be the camera
you want to use. If you have a lot of sync dialog you
probably want to look into the Arri-35BL, the "BL" means
"Blimped Lens" so camera noise doesn't come out the
front end.
Josh
|
|
Name:
DREW
E-mail:
Dear
Josh:
Hey
man, sorry I missed your chat session you had the other
day. How did it go, and will there be a transcript posted
soon? Thanks.
|
|
Dear
Drew:
I
think these internet chats are a big technological step
backward. TV, Radio, telephone, or two cans and a piece
of string all beat it. It was pretty much worthless,
I thought. There have been hundreds more interesting
Qs and As here on this site, from people just like you.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Pleasure
E-mail: pleasure03@cs.com
Dear
Josh:
What
are your disadvantages and advantages? How much do you
make a year ?
|
|
Dear
Pleasure:
Both
my biggest advantage and disadvantage are probably my
overcharged, underwhelmed brain. I have made as much
as $90,000 a year, but so far this year I haven't made
a cent.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Mary Terrell
E-mail: METBard@aol.com
Dear
Josh:
I
just read you're commentary on stupid American cowboys
and wanted to say that I agree with you. I've often
said to others when the handgun debate has come up that
having one doesn't guarentee your safety.
|
|
Dear
Mary:
No,
I'd say a gun does not guarantee safety, that is an
illusion. I drove a taxi in Detroit for a couple of
years. Nearly every driver but me had a gun and many
got held up. I never did because A.) I was lucky, but
B.) I tried to be as polite and pleasant to all of my
fares as I could be, with the knowledge that some of
them undoubtedly had guns There is no guarantee to safety,
but being polite is probably a better approach than
carrying a gun, which is illegal.
Josh
|
|
Name:
ALAN
E-mail: picquickstudio@aol.com
Josh
I
think you are so lucky not to have to direct JOAT again;this
show does not work at all.Because you never get to see
the characters in any real danger the action scenes
do not grab the attention at all.In any case,as much
as I like Bruce Campbell,he has never been able to throw
a convincing punch and the daring dragoon idea should
have been stifled at birth.
|
|
Dear
Alan:
Yeah,
but it paid pretty well. Quite frankly, I think "Jack"
is a dead duck anyway.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Joe Fay
E-mail: Joseph_k_fay@icpphil.navy.mil
Dear
Josh:
What
year was "Hell is for Heros" released and was there
a TV series based on the film?
|
|
Dear
Joe:
The
film was made in 1962 and was kind of important in the
early career of Steve McQueen, but I always thought
he was too glum and downbeat in it. It's got that oddball
cast, too: Fess Parker, Bobby Darin, James Coburn, Bob
Newhart, and it was directed by Don Siegel and I still
don't care for it. I don't think a TV series was based
on it.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Elizabeth
E-mail: elizabethannebennett@hotmail.com
Hi Josh,
I
just read "America: Land of the Stupid Cowboys". It
was really interesting to read, especially since I am
not from the United States. I am Canadian. I just wanted
to comment that right after I read your article, I went
to watch tv and the Simpson's was on. It was the episode
where Homer joins a gun club, gets a gun and abuses
it by using it to open beer cans and turn on the tv.
I thought it was very coincidental and strange that
this episode was on right after I read your article.
Well, take care and keep writing. :)
Elizabeth
|
|
Dear
Elizabeth:
I've
never seen that one. There's something wonderful in
that I'm so bad at catching a weekly TV show that I've
missed at least half of "The Simpsons" episodes, and
I've been watching since the 2nd season. I don't think
I've actually brought up anything new in my gun essay,
but I just felt that the situation was not being clearly
presented. We don't have to let our country slide down
the toilet if we don't want, but it entails standing
up for something.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Buddy
E-mail:
Hey Josh.
Quick
question about your buddy Ted Raimi. What exactly is
the deal with him and Xena this coming Xena. From what
I've been hearing it seems he's left the show and won't
be on it for the coming season. Since you know him,
is it true that he has left and if so do you know why
he decided to leave?
Thanks
for your time.
Buddy
|
|
Dear
Buddy:
I
guess his contract expired and he didn't re-up. I really
don't want to be a pipeline to information about "Xena."
Josh
|
|
Name:
Tamandra
E-mail: TAMandraM@aol.com
Josh,
I,too,am
very impressed with your current essay on the gun issue.
I'm often dismayed by the screwed up logic this country
has on many issues, and I'm right with you on this one.
I also live in L.A., and I heard recently that something
like 6 out of 10 drivers have a concealed weapon on
them, quite a scary thought, given the ridiculous amount
of road rage one sees on any given day here. People
used to get into fist fights when someone pissed them
off, now,there are some that will pull out a pistol
and shoot, and think nothing of it. I've heard some
really unbelievable stories from a teacher of mine of
the results of the "freedom" of having guns. Things
like a friend who tried to intercede with an argument
a couple was having in a parking lot, shot dead before
he hit the ground. Some guy flips off a bunch of kids
in tangle of road rage, and gets chased down into a
store and shot multiple times in the open, after which
the the youth gunmen nonchalantly walked back to their
car. It's insane, now you have pre-pubescent children
toting guns and labeling themselves thugs,wanting to
be a renegade, and eschewing gangs even.
Even
more ludicrous is that I hear ehoed constantly, that
"all these kids need is a good whipping." Yeah, that's
the anwser, bring back corporal punishment in schools,
get rid of all those violent video games, movies and
tv shows, and somehow this will magically turn the clock
back to some imaginary blissful time of "old fashioned
values".
I
think the religious right has a frightening amount of
influence with those in power. There is so much hypocracy,
not to mention ignorance and stupidity going on with
that issue! (As Bruce says,"don't get me started" lol).
Now that one is a thorn in my side, too, and I try to
vent through my art. In fact, your essay has got my
wheels spinning toward doing a painting about the issues
you touched on. I'm curious about what you think of
the visual arts, and what artist's work you might have
felt drawn to in that segment.
Thanks
for the essay, and as always, your unique no bullshit
insight.
Tamandra
|
|
Dear
Tamandra:
BTW,
Bruce is imitating Lou Costello with, "Don't get me
started." As to the "visual arts," which movies are
certainly a part of, I think you just mean painters,
right? I like Rembrandt and the Dutch Masters and particularly
their use of black. I like Dali and Van Gogh and Monet
and Manet and Renoir and Magritte and Serrault and Miro
and Mondrian and Hopper and Picasso and Degas and Sargent
and my brain is spinning with shapes and colors. But,
by golly I sure like those deep blacks.
Josh
|
|
Name:
david owen
E-mail: iggybonce@hotmail.com
Dear
Josh:
josh
am hosting a film festival in the uk this fall. would
love to show some of your films. any chance?
cheers
owen
|
|
Dear
Owen:
Here's
the deal: I have one 35mm blow-up print of "Running
Time" that cost almost $6000 and I'm not crazy about
how it looks; I have two chewed-up 16mm prints; I have
one pristine 35mm print of "Lunatics" I don't want to
send anywhere; I have another 35mm print that has chewed-up
sections on several reels; and I have one beat-up but
showable 35mm print of "TSNKE" and two other beat-up
and unshowable prints of it, and my new film isn't done
yet. I recommend purchasing a DVD of "Running Time,"
which looks better than any of the film prints, and
projecting it. "TSNKE" is supposed to be out on DVD
in Sept.
Josh
|
|
Name:
D. Sticker
E-mail: mrsticker@mindspring.com
Dear
Josh:
I
LOVE your perspective and I love TSNKE. Here's a little
poem that I wrote, it's called "TSNKE"
Everyone
needs love
We dont need TSNKE
We love TSNKE
|
|
Dear
D. Sticker:
Helluva
good poem there, dude, keep up the good work.
Josh
|
|
Name: Bill
E-mail:
Josh!
Have you ever seen "The Story of GI Joe" with Robert
Mitchum and Burgess Meredith? Oh my God, I'm going back
in to watch it again! Awesome!
|
|
Dear
Bill:
I
saw it on TV when I was about ten. You make it sound
great, so I'll try to catch it again. It's very early
Mitchum.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Todd
E-mail: toddowoddo@hotmail.com
Hi Josh,
Just
wanted you to know how refreshing I found your essay
on guns in this country. I wish that our elected official's
had the balls to bluntly make so strong a point as you
just did. Instead they always speak in vague generalities
without expressing any real convictions.
Have
you seen the two commercials aired recently by the NRA
featuring Heston (attempting to counter that recent
women's march on Washington)? The ads use the phrase
"gun safety" and repeatedly empasize "education" over
"polictics". They're going to donate a million dollars
to schools to educate children about gun safety, and
they want us to donate money too (isn't that nice?)!
Think about the warped logic that professes: Instead
of passing laws requiring trigger-locks or making it
harder for kids to obtain guns, schools should be teaching
kids how to handle them safely! Well, the NRA's idea
of gun safety ("only aim at what you intend to shoot")
would hardly prevent the likes of the Littleton shootings
-- if anything, it simply would have made the killers
better shots.
You
also touched briefly on another major thorn in MY side
-- our democracy's destruction at the hands of corporate
America (the uber-citizenry!) and the public's resulting
helplessness and apathy.
I
have recently decided to support Ralph Nader in the
next Presidential election, and if you check out his
views and essays at http://www.votenader.com/index.html
you'll understand why. The media often suggests that
voting for a third-party candidate merely helps or hurts
the Democrat or Republican (i.e. "real") contenders,
or worse, they fail to acknowledge that alternative
candidates even exist. This is hardly surprising, since
the media is in the hands of four or five corporations
(Murdoch, Disney, GE, etc.) who benefit from maintaining
the status quo. Plus you have a bi-partisan committee
controlling which candidates participate in debates
(resulting in two debaters -- big surprise!).
Look
at our choices this time: Are either Bush or Gore going
to press for real change in this country? Of course
not; they'll be working to perpetuate the same corrupt
system that got them elected. There have been third
party candidates elected in the past and it could happen
again if people stopped voting for "the lesser of two
evils" and instead searched for real alternatives. But
we really do have to *search* -- you won't see the local
news including any third-party candidate in their "plus
or minus 5%" poll results. (What happens to that 5%?
If they have the number of people polled, can't they
get a correct figure? Don't they have calculators? The
problem is that not everyone polled wants to choose
between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, but the pollsters
aren't interested in those people.)
Realistically,
a third party candidate probably doesn't have a chance
in *this* coming election. But it's still early, and
Nader is actually getting some media attention (both
the UAW and some environmentalist groups have stated
publicly that they no longer trust Gore). My hope is
that he can win the necessary 15% vote to qualify the
Green party for *federal funds*, and then they'll have
a better chance four years from now. And I don't care
if Nader takes votes away from Gore and ultimately helps
Bush win, because I can't see any real difference between
those two anyway.
|
|
Dear
Todd:
I
do. I'm not crazy about the Democrats, but I'm frightened
by Republicans. I feel the Republicans number one agenda
is always to get us into a war as quick as possible
because it's good for industry and big business. Quite
frankly, I think there's WORLD of difference between
Gore and Bush the Younger; at least Gore's heart's in
the right place and he has a good solid sense of enviornmental
values. As someone said of Bush, jr. recently, "He was
born on 3rd base and thinks he hit a triple." Both Bushes
are putzes and I don't want the kid anywhere near the
White House.
Good
letter, Todd.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Bill
E-mail:
Dear
Josh:
Are
you able to attach actors to your projects to help you
sale them? For instance, if you wrote a script that
you wanted Bruce Willis to be in could you send the
script to him and (if he were to like it) become attached
to the project. This would certainly make selling it
easier, right? Do you have to pay an actor anything?
For instance, you talk about your war movie and if you
attached some names to it, would it be easier to get
someone to back it. Looking forward to your Lycos
chat.
|
|
Dear
Bill:
Attaching
an actor to aproject is another ridiculous, idiotic
Hollywood Catch-22. First of all, I can't get anything
to anybody, you need agents for that and I don't have
an agent. Second, actors with any name at all, let alone
Bruce Willis, are only interested in financed, "Go"
projects. I could probably hustle 2nd or 3rd level "name"
actors, like the actors that do TV movies, but that
won't get a project financed.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Sirand
E-mail: sirand@aol.com
Hey Josh!
Been
looking over a lot of your film criticisms and essays,
and some of your rants have made me curious. If all
screen-writers and directors followed your story structures,
wouldn't all movies be really BORING? Surely in an industry
full of cheap clones and unoriginality, you have to
acknowledge the Terry Gilliams and Spike Jonzes out
there who try to do something DIFFERENT. Don't you believe
in taking risks with story structures?
|
|
Dear
Sirand:
No.
You need to read my six structure essays. Simply put,
though, you cannot move beyond the form until you've
mastered the form. You can't get to deconstruction until
you completely understand construction. To use the building
metaphor, as I have several times before, if you build
a house with no roof you may think of yourself as a
"risk-taker," but in fact you're just a shitty builder
that built a worthless house. Not having a roof, walls
or a foundation is not a viable choice.
Josh
|
|
Name:
MRS CAROLE BEDFORD
E-mail: carlton tavern@ic24.net
Dear
Josh:
I
just got to read about your working with anthony quinn
and thoroughly enjoyed it he can be a difficult old
boy cant he? but then he was a very complex young man
as well as a difficult one he has been my idol since
i was a child and i am now 49 and in the last few days
the world has been saddened by the death of sir john
guiguld but i really would be overwrought at the passing
of anthony quinn my darling darling beautiful complex
man im so jealous that you have all those autographs
and i have none go on make an old girl very happy and
thanks for sharing the insight into your time spent
with him regards for the future.
|
|
Dear
Carole:
My
good buddy Tony Quinn. I earned my money working with
him.
Josh
|
|
Name:
August
E-mail: joxerfan@hotmail.com
Dear Josh:
Thanks
for your kind response to my previous question - you
made my day!
I
just noticed that John Gielgud passed away. His distinguished
stage career notwithstanding, I have always been impressed
with his film work as a character actor, winning an
Oscar for essentially a stock-role in "Arthur," and
still playing wise counselor-guys well into his '90's.
Any reflections or comments on his work?
Thanks,
August
|
|
Dear
August:
I'm
sorry to hear about John Gielgud, although he was 150
years old. He's the last of the great trio of British
theater actors: Laurence Olivier, Ralph Richardson,
and John Gielgud. He was pretty darn funny in "Arthur."
Although he was good in everything, he never really
got great film roles. Apparently, Gielgud was instrumental
in helping Marlon Brando get through "Julius Caesar."
He was also renowned for sticking his foot in his mouth,
amusingly termed "Giel-goofs." Another era has ended.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Alan
E-mail: Picquickstudio@aol.com
Dear Josh,
I
have just watched the JOAT episode "The Floundering
Father" and wondered if you could tell me the name of
the guy who played Blackbeard? I need to know so that
if I ever see his name attached to any other project
I can avoid it like the plague;even if it were to star
a re-incarnated Bruce Lee,Marilyn Monroe and James Dean!
|
|
Dear
Alan:
Sorry,
I have no idea who it is. I don't watch the show, and
I certainly won't be watching any from now on. Quite
frankly, I don't like TV shows (except "The Simpsons").
It's a perfectly good appliance for watching movies,
however.
Josh
|
|
Name:
August
E-mail: joxerfan@hotmail.com
Dear Josh:
While
it sucks for your fans that we may not see any more
Xena/Herc/Jack episodes directed by you, all is for
the best if it enabled you to get "Hammer" done, and
now inspires you to get going on the WWI movie. (And
didn't you say you had a Western in the works too?)
So
here's a sincere question that seriously I bet a lot
of your fans are wondering. Once "Hammer" is finished,
what can we do to help its success? Will you go the
video distribution route as with "Running Time?" Do
you hope to line up a theatre distribution deal? Here
in my town there is an independent "art film" house
that runs indie films, foreign films, classic films,
etc. But would getting a 2-3 day, 4-6 screenings run
of your film at any isolated theatre help you in the
long run? (If yes, say "Yes!")
Or
would video sales and rentals be the best route for
you ultimately? In that case, I should think word of
mouth recommendations might be helpful.
C'mon
- I don't want to have to wait for a revival of "Real
Stories of the Highway Patrol" to see more of your work!
Thanks,
August
|
|
Dear
August:
You
are a nice, funny fellow and I appreciate all of your
letters. I will certainly try for a theatrical release
on "Hammer," however, since it's a very expensive proposition,
I don't depend on it. As for video distribution, which
is better than a sharp stick in the eye, I will be hard
pressed to make my money back. I still haven't broken
even on "Running Time" and that only cost $130,000.
"Hammer" is pushing $300,000, so if I don't do a better
job than I did with "RT," I'm boned. Thanks for the
kind thoughts, though.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Trisha Von Doss
E-mail: xenamour@cs.com
Dear Mr. Becker,
I
have need of a literary agent. I was wondering if there
were any agents, or agencies, you would recommend. I
know it is essential that the agent one chooses, (or
perhaps, who Choose You), works in one's medium of choice.
I
was wondering if it isn't also important for the literary
agent chosen, be oriented to a particular genere, or
to a particular television show if for example, you
are trying to shop your story to a specific show.
Thanks.
Trish Von Doss
|
|
Dear
Trish:
In
24 years in Hollywood I've had 8 different agents and
none of them ever got me a job. The concept of a "good
agent" is an oxymoron. The bottom line, ultimately,
is the only agent you want is the agent that wants you,
because if they don't think you're special and wonderful
they are not going to work for you. As Woody Allen said
of the movie business, it's not dog eat dog, it's dog
doesn't call dog back.
Josh
|
|
Name:
LINDA SPALTON
E-mail: spalton@hotmail.com
Dear
Josh:
I
feel that apart from the story line/plot being the last
thing film makers have thought of before releasing,
that the technique of good lighting which would in many
cases replace dialogue, seems to be neglected, alot
of the films do not seem to be able to come over that
well, they are too bright even though its a thriller!
|
|
DearLinda:
You
said it.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Rickster
E-mail:
Josh,
Hi,
why won't you be directing for Ren Pictures anymore?
Best,
Rickster
|
|
Dear
Rickster:
I
don't care to dwell on it, but the reason given me was
that they were only using New Zealand directors, who
are half as much money with no residuals. That sucks,
but that's life, I suppose.
Josh
|
|
Name:
August
E-mail: joxerfan@hotmail.com
Dear Josh,
Just
wanted to take a minute and let you know how much I
enjoyed your latest essay on "The Need For Structure."
"River Kwai" has always been one of my favorites as
well, and yet I had never really considered the stubbornness
of the Alec Guiness character to be a negative (until
the end, of course.) The whole "duty" theme had been
pretty obvious to me, but you've provided an interesting
new interpretation, for me anyway. I also laughed out
loud at your correspondent's claim that he was "a rebel."
Just
as you said that a theme could be as simple as one word,
I've read that an actor's "motivation" can be simplified
to one desire, as in "I want...." whatever. Any thought
on that, or how you've worked with actors on that issue?
Oh,
by the way, I just passed on that Stooges info since
you had expressed outrage at how shabbily they had been
treated at Columbia, and I thought you might be interested
in knowing that their heirs, at least, were at last
benefitting from their body of work. (However belatedly!)
Thanks,
August
|
|
Dear
August:
Thank
God someone read that essay, I was beginning to think
I'd written it for my own amusement, which I did, but
still. Since the theme comes out of the characters,
particularly the lead, then that one word is the same
for both. For both Sessue Hayakawa and Alec Guinness
their motivations are "Duty" and what it specifically
means to their characters.
Josh
|
|
Name:
bill
E-mail:
Dear
Josh:
On
the not directing any more ren pics shows...why the
hell not? By the way, I saw Being John Malkovich and
I honestly can't believe you surivived the first 30
minutes. Anything that was remotely amusing was stolen,
although most movies are that way. Also, I saw Fight
Club, which people have asked you numerous times if
you've seen. I can't see how anyone would like this
flawed piece of crap either. There were some interesting
directing techniques used but the script was a total
piece of crap and it seemed the writer had 5 minutes
of material and turned it into a mini series.
|
|
Dear
Bill:
I
guess my services weren't appreciated. I honestly did
like the first 15-20 of "Being John Malkovich" when
it was the story of this ridiculously low-budget couple.
It wasn't until they found the tunnel into John Malkovich's
head that I lost interest--but then it was a total loss.
I finally did see "The Fight Club" and there's perhaps
a third of an interesting movie there. The idea of guys
fighting to lose is completely stupid to me, and when
Brad Pitt turns out to actually be Ed Norton it all
drops dead. All that crap with commandos in black berets
was pathetic.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Tammy
E-mail: TLJ102@aol.com
Dear
Josh:
Hi
im a big fan of yours. I am also a huge fan of the books
The Lord of the Rings. I just wanted to know what your
feeling are on the movies that they are filming of the
books, and if they had offered would you have ever considered
directing it? Thanks!
|
|
Dear
Tammy:
I'm
entirely the wrong guy for the job, having never finished
the books because the completely didn't interest me.
I don't like that kind of fantasy, with cute, furry
hobbits and shit like that. I was a serious science
fiction fan--Asimov, Ellison, Heinlein, Clarke--and
was actively against such silliness as "Lord of the
Rings." I know a number of people working on the crew
and I hear that it's a completely insane, totally out-of-control
production, which doesn't bode well for a good movie.
Peter Jackson is a much more appropriate choice than
I. Sadly, I don't care for any of his movies.
Josh
|
|
Name:
August
E-mail: joxerfan@hotmail
Dear Josh:
There's
a rumor floating about the net about your bud Ted Raimi
turning up on "Jack of All Trades" next year. Any truth
to that? Also, any word on any eps you might direct
of that or of XWP?
Also,
from one Stooges fan to another, this may warm the cockles
of your heart: According to the official Stooges website,
the TV movie "received tremendous television ratings.
More people watched The Three StoogesŪ movie than watched
any other ABC Monday night movie for the last four years.....
We, however, wish you to know that today the heirs company,
C3 Entertainment, Inc., owns all merchandising rights,
all trademarks, and all other rights pertaining to The
Three StoogesŪ brand. Although Columbia may not have
treated the Stooges well in the past, we are pleased
to report that at the present time the Stooges heirs,
through C3 Entertainment, Inc., have resolved all past
differences with Columbia and today are working with
Columbia to bring to you new productions including a
brand new theatrical Three Stooges motion picture, which
we hope will be available to you in 2001. "
Not
too shabby!
Thanks,
August
|
|
Dear
August:
I
can say with reasonable certainty that I will not be
directing anymore TV shows for Renaissance Pictures.
So it goes. I guess I'll be forced to make my feature
film career work now. I didn't even see the Stooges
TV movie, so it doesn't much matter to me. But if you
enjoyed it, that's great.
Josh
|
|
Name:
omerdahoush
E-mail: omerdahoush@usa.net
Dear Josch Becker
My
name Omer Dahoush and I live in Sweden. My question
is if there are good directing school in Miami and how
I can make kontact with them?
Thank
you
Omer
|
|
Dear
Omer:
If
you're serious about going to film school, you need
to try to get into New York University, University of
Southern California or the University of California
Los Angeles. I've never heard of a good film school
in Miami.
Good luck.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Resin Head
E-mail:
Josh,
I
like the fact that you are open about your enjoyment
of marijuana. It actually is a courageous act in this
day and age.
My
question: have you ever written any scripts that could
be considered a "stoner flick?" I like your writing
and it seems like you would be able to pull off a well
written structured film on this topic free of the "Cheech
and Chong" meets "Dazed and Confused" cliches that plague
every pot film I've ever seen.
I
will do a bong hit in your honor at tonights screening
of "Running Time."
Your
bud,
Resin Head
|
|
Dear
Resin Head:
Yes,
as a matter of fact, I did write a stoner comedy (with
Scott Spiegel) called "Delirious" in 1983. It's the
story of the odyssey of two stoners trying to buy a
bag of weed, and finally ending up in Ann Arbor during
the yearly Hash Bash, which no longer exists.
Enjoy
your bong hit and "Running Time."
Josh
|
|
Name:
Gord
E-mail: gord@gordzajac.com
Josh, I'm just curious if you've seen any Canadian films
lately? Specifically, I'm thinking of such films as
"Red Violin," "Last Night," "The Sweet Hereafter," etc.
Being
from Canada, I know I'm a little biased, but I find
a lot of these films are far more solidly crafted (in
terms of story structure, character arcs, etc.) than
most current Hollywood films (Sixth Sense being an obvious
exception...)
Gord
|
|
Dear
Gord:
I
have not seen any of those films, nor any of Atom Egoyan's
films. Why? I don't know. I'll keep my eyes peeled for
them, though.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Paul
E-mail: don't have one
Dear Josh,
I
was just browsing through your favorite films list and
I was a bit shocked to see "Slacker" there. First of
all, what in God's name did you like about this movie?
I can't even sit through it. It's just a bunch of generation-x
stereotypes who have absolutely nothing to say. Linklater
states his point within the first 10 minutes but keeps
on pounding it in for some reason.
Also,
this film has no structure to it, which leads me to
the following question. When do you believe the rules
of structure can be disregarded?
Best
wishes to you
|
|
Dear
Paul:
It
most certainly does have a structure, but not a normal
one, nor one that will get you through 97 minutes. The
structure, which I'd never seen before (and never needs
to be repeated) is that one character takes you to the
next that takes you to the next that takes you to the
next . . . I thought it actually worked rather well
for 45-60 minutes. I'll bet I couldn't sit all the way
through it again, but I enjoyed in the theater.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Paul
E-mail: don't have one
Dear Josh,
What
kind of cigars was Bruce really smoking in your excellent
film "Running Time?" Also, are you a cigar smoker yourself?
|
|
Dear
Paul:
I
don't know, they were purchased by the art director,
but I can assure that they weren't really Cuban as is
stated in the film. I don't smoke cigars, just cigarettes.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Spill the Wine
E-mail: spillit@ao.com
Hi Josh,
I've
seen all of your films so far and it occurred to me
that your films, although well-structured, lack a bite.
I wanted to know what your ultimate goal is? Do you
make films just to please yourself, or to try to get
a serious production company/distributor to pick them
up? I ask these questions not to insult or make you
upset, but to understand what your ultimate goal is
as a director. I mean, if you are making films to get
recognized by the Hollywood establishment then why do
you sabatoge relationships with people who can help
that process along? It's not about kissing ass, but
maybe about just keeping your mouth shut until you get
a good deal. Then, once you are successful, you can
throw all the temper tantrums you want. Just a thought.
On the other hand, if you are just making films for
your own pleasure, tell them all to kiss your ass. You
have a couple of powerful friends who help you out with
TV directing gigs in the downtime anyway.
|
|
Dear
Spill the Wine:
I'm
not sure what you mean by "lack a bite?" Perhaps you'll
find some bite in my next film, "If I Had a Hammer."
Perhaps not. I certainly made the last two films entirely
for me. If my goal was to make it in Hollywood, I don't
think a period folk musical allegory will get me one
inch further. It amuses me when folks that have no clue
what they're talking about give me advice (Bruce Campbell
gets career advice daily). "It's not about kissing ass"?
How do you know? It seems to me that kissing ass is
what it's ALL about.
Josh
|
|
Name:
Rocky
E-mail:
Josh, What happened to the boxing movie you always wanted
to do? Do you still plan on writing a script for it?
|
|
Dear
Rocky:
What
boxing movie? I don't recall ever mentioning one. I
am a boxing fan, and I did make a Super-8 boxing movie,
"The Final Round." Also, my script "Teddy Roosevelt
in the Badlands" has boxing in it.
Josh
|
BACK
TO Main
Archive Page
BACK
TO Current
Q&A
|
|
|